BREAST Gynecomastia : Evolving Paradigm of Management and Comparison of Techniques

P. Petty,D. M.,M. Solomon,S. M.B.B.,E. Buchel
Abstract:Rochester, Minn.; and Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Background: Since 1997, the authors have used a minimally invasive technique for the management of gynecomastia using ultrasound-assisted liposuction and the arthroscopic shaver to remove breast tissue through a remote incision. This technique has allowed for a consistent, refined, “unoperated” postoperative appearance in this patient population. This study analyzes the outcomes of this procedure and compares the procedure against established techniques. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on all patients who underwent surgery for gynecomastia at the authors’ institution between January of 1988 and October of 2007. A total of 227 patients were divided into four groups: group 1, open excision only (n 45); group 2, open excision plus liposuction (n 56); group 3, liposuction only (n 50); and group 4, liposuction plus arthroscopic shaver (n 76). Medical records and photographs were used to compare groups for complications and results. Results: Complications using the liposuction plus arthroscopic shaver technique included seroma (n 2), hematoma (n 1), scar revision (n 1), and skin buttonhole from the arthroscopic shaver (n 1). There was no difference between groups in the overall incidence of complications (p 0.20) or the need for reoperation (p 0.325). Results were scored on a scale of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). Group 4 (liposuction plus arthroscopic shaver) had the overall highest mean score, with statistical significance between group 2 (open excision plus liposuction) and group 4 (p 0.0001). Conclusion: Arthroscopic mastectomy for gynecomastia is a safe and effective technique, with excellent cosmetic results and an acceptable complication rate. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 125: 1301, 2010.)
What problem does this paper attempt to address?