Abstract:Satellite networks are expected to support global connectivity via future 3GPP non-terrestrial networks (NTNs), as well as private non-geostationary satellite orbit (NGSO) constellations, e.g. OneWeb, SpaceX, and Amazon's Kuiper. In both 3GPP and private NGSO networks, handling mobility is critical, due to the intrinsic continuous movement of the satellites. In this paper we select three representative inter-satellite handover (HO) strategies and we study their impact on the achievable space-to-ground link performance in emerging NGSO constellations. With 1) Closest Satellite HO a ground station always connects to the closest satellite, with 2) Max Visibility HO a ground station connects and remains connected to the satellite with the maximum visibility time, until this satellite stops being visible, while with 3) CINR-based HO a ground station is handed over to the closest satellite if the carrier-to-interference-and-noise ratio (CINR) decreases by 3 dB below a maximum reference level. The first two HO strategies achieve the upper and lower bounds of the satellite-to-ground link performance based on the constellation geometry, while the third one is representative of HO mechanisms triggered by signal strength measurements. We consider five private constellations with different characteristics, some of which have already been launched. The goal is to determine the most suitable HO strategy for each constellation and our results show that this depends on the constellation type, i.e. low earth orbit (LEO), medium earth orbit (MEO) and highly elliptical orbit (HEO), and design. For large LEO constellations with thousands of satellites like SpaceX and Kuiper, CINR-based HO is recommended, since it achieves a good tradeoff among the spectral efficiency, propagation delay and handover rate, while the Doppler shift is in any case high. For smaller LEO constellations with hundreds of satellites like OneWeb, Closest Satellite HO is preferred due to the highest spectral efficiency and lowest propagation delay, while the handover overhead is similar for all strategies. For MEO and HEO constellations with tens to a few hundreds of satellites like Mangata and Pleiades, Closest Satellite HO is best. This achieves the highest spectral efficiency, lowest delay and sometimes a low Doppler shift, while the handover rate is in any case low. Finally, CINR-based HO is recommended in seldom cases of strong inter-constellation interference. Overall, the results suggest that the inter-satellite HO strategy should be adjusted to the constellation specifics, where e.g. adaptive handover selection algorithms could be employed for constellations that are enhanced in time by adding new satellites and orbit types.

Handover Protocol Learning for LEO Satellite Networks: Access Delay and Collision Minimization

A Graph Reinforcement Learning-Based Handover Strategy for Low Earth Orbit Satellites under Power Grid Scenarios

A Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Handover Scheme for Mega-Constellation under Dynamic Propagation Conditions

Intelligent Active Handover Decision Algorithm for Uplink Transmission of Delay-Sensitive Tasks in LEO Satellite Networks

A Successive Deep Q-Learning Based Distributed Handover Scheme for Large-Scale LEO Satellite Networks.

Enhancing Handover for 5G mmWave Mobile Networks Using Jump Markov Linear System and Deep Reinforcement Learning

DQN-ALrM-Based Intelligent Handover Method for Satellite-Ground Integrated Network

Seamless Handover in LEO Based Non-Terrestrial Networks: Service Continuity and Optimization

Load-Aware Satellite Handover Strategy Based on Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Integrating LEO Satellite and UAV Relaying via Reinforcement Learning for Non-Terrestrial Networks

Distributed Routing Algorithm for LEO Satellite Network Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning

Learning Emergent Random Access Protocol for LEO Satellite Networks

Intelligent Dual Active Protocol Stack Handover based on Double DQN Deep Reinforcement Learning for 5G mmWave Networks

Handover Strategies for Emerging LEO, MEO, and HEO Satellite Networks

Cooperative user association and resource allocation for task offloading in hybrid GEO‐LEO satellite networks

Joint Access Selection and Computation Offloading in LEO Ubiquitous Edge Computing Networks: an Alternating DRL-Based Approach

An Intelligent Routing Algorithm for LEO Satellites Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning

Onboard Processing Aided Transmission Delay Minimization for LEO Satellite Networks

Interference-Aware Emergent Random Access Protocol for Downlink LEO Satellite Networks

A Two-Step Handover Strategy for GEO/LEO Heterogeneous Satellite Networks Based on Multi-Attribute Decision Making

Accelerating Handover in Mobile Satellite Network