Origin of the Moon and Lunar Water

Nick Gorkavyi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/eps.v2i2.940
2023-10-26
Abstract:Three principal concepts regarding lunar formation have been examined: the accretion hypothesis, the mega-impact theory, and the multi-impact model. The multi-impact model amalgamates the salient facets of the mega-impact theory and the accretion hypothesis. As per this model, fragments of the terrestrial crust are ejected into space during collisions with numerous planetesimals (proto-asteroids) with diameters around 10-100 kilometers. This ejecta interacts with the accretion disk, augmenting its mass. Different models of lunar formation yield varied conclusions regarding the quantity of lunar water, its subsurface distribution, and isotopic composition. Geomorphological structures in the lunar polar regions (smoothed craters, landslides, regular patterns) suggest the presence of a substantial permafrost layer with an approximate thickness of a kilometer.
Earth and Planetary Astrophysics,Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is about the origin of the Moon and its water. Specifically, the paper explores three main lunar formation theories: the accretion hypothesis, the giant - impact theory, and the multi - impact model, and analyzes the different predictions of these theories regarding the amount, distribution, and isotopic composition of lunar water. The main purpose of the paper is to explore the origin of the Moon and the source of its water by comparing the predictions of different models regarding lunar water. ### Overview of the Main Content of the Paper: 1. **Introduction**: - In recent years, various lunar exploration programs have been actively promoted, especially those in the United States and China, which are the most ambitious. - The paper introduces three main lunar formation theories: the accretion hypothesis, the giant - impact theory, and the multi - impact model. 2. **The Accretion Model and Its Challenges**: - The accretion theory was initially proposed by the Safronov group to explain the formation of terrestrial planets. - The accretion model faces two main challenges: - The mass fraction of the generated protosatellite disk is relatively low (10^-3 to 10^-4), which is not sufficient to explain the large mass of the Moon (1/81 of the Earth's mass). - It cannot explain the average chemical composition of the Moon, including its low density (3.3 g/cm³) and low iron content (13% FeO). 3. **The Giant - Impact Model and Its Challenges**: - The giant - impact theory was initially proposed by R. Daly in 1946 and later elaborated by W. Hartmann and D. Davis in 1975. - According to this theory, about 4.5 billion years ago, an object with a diameter of about 1,200 kilometers hit the Earth at a speed of 13 kilometers per second, providing enough kinetic energy to eject the material of two lunar masses to near - escape velocity. - The giant - impact model explains the low iron content, high refractory element abundance, and volatile - poor nature of the Moon. - However, this model has some problems, such as the highly consistent isotopic composition between the Moon and the Earth, which is inconsistent with the differences predicted by the giant - impact model. 4. **The Multi - Impact Model and Its Predictions**: - The multi - impact model was proposed by Gorkavyi in 2004 to explain the formation of the Moon, Charon, and binary asteroids without relying on catastrophic events. - Key elements include: - Most of the Moon's material comes from the Earth's mantle through multiple large - asteroid (with a diameter of about 1 - 100 kilometers) impacts. - There is initially a low - mass prograde protosatellite disk. - The collisions between Earth fragments and prograde protosatellite disk particles play a crucial role, allowing the fragments to enter stable orbits. - Calculations show that the optimal radius of the protosatellite ring is close to the average semi - major axis of the fragment orbit. - Eventually, a large, low - iron ring close to the Earth gradually accumulates to form the Moon. - Predictions include: - Asteroid satellites should have prograde, circular orbits and be close to the equator of the central body. - Asteroids with satellites should rotate faster than single asteroids. - Low - speed - rotating asteroids (or Earth - like planets) usually do not have satellites. - The relative mass of satellites can increase with the size of asteroids. - The Moon should show chemical, isotopic, and geological features of multiple different asteroid impacts. ### Conclusion: The paper explores the origin of the Moon and the source of its water by comparing the predictions of different models regarding lunar water. The multi - impact model combines the advantages of the accretion hypothesis and the giant - impact theory, can explain the chemical composition, isotopic composition, and geological features of the Moon, and at the same time avoids dynamic problems. This model is not only applicable to the formation of the Moon, but also to the formation of Charon and asteroid satellites, thus providing rich observational data for verifying this theory.