How does Module Tracking for Agrivoltaics Differ from Standard Photovoltaics? Performance & Technoeconomic Implications

Habeel Alam,Nauman Zafar Butt

2023-10-26

Abstract:Spatial-temporal sharing of sunlight between solar modules and crops needs to be designed optimally in agrivoltaics (AV). For AV with fixed module tilts, the sunlight balance is governed through the spatial density and elevation of the modules which cannot be manipulated after the installation. For flexible food-energy balancing across various seasons and crop rotations, modules with single or dual axis mobility can be best suitable. AV tracking must be geared towards ensuring a desired sunlight balance that may depend on many factors including the crop type, module array density, socio-economic factors, and local policies. Here, we explore single axis customized tracking (CT) for the mobile AV using a techno-economic model that incorporates design parameters including crop's shade sensitivity, module to land area ratio, and module types, as well as the economic parameters including soft and hardware costs for modules, feed-in-tariff, and crop income. CT is implemented through standard tracking that tracks the sun around noon hours and its orthogonal, i.e., anti-tracking around sunrise and sunset. We evaluate the optimal CT schemes that can maximize economic performance while ensuring the desired food-energy yield thresholds. Economic feasibility for AV is evaluated in terms of the ratio (ppr) of the price for the module system customizations to the performance benefit due to the crop income. A case study for Punjab, Pakistan shows that CT schemes for moderate shade sensitive crops and typically dense AV module arrays can require 30 to 40 percent increase in the reference FIT to ensure the food-energy yield threshold of 80 percent relative to standalone food-energy farms for high and low value crops, respectively. CT schemes for a lower crop yield threshold of 70 percent require the corresponding increase in FIT to 10 to 20 percent, respectively.

Systems and Control,Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to optimize the design of the Agrivoltaics (AV) system through the Customized Tracking (CT) technology to achieve economic and technical feasibility while meeting specific food - energy output thresholds. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following key issues:

1. **How does the response of different crops to shading affect the design of CT schemes?**
- The paper explores the yield changes of shade - sensitive crops (S), shade - tolerant crops (T), and shade - loving crops (L) under different light conditions and proposes CT schemes suitable for these crop types.

2. **What is the impact of energy and crop yield thresholds on the design of CT schemes?**
- By setting an 80% energy and crop yield threshold, the paper analyzes the performance of CT schemes under different land - module area ratios (ALM).

3. **Which CT schemes can be economically feasible while ensuring the required food - energy output thresholds?**
- The paper evaluates the economic feasibility of different CT schemes through the Price - Performance Ratio (PPR) and proposes the optimal schemes under different crop types and system configurations.

4. **How does the module array design (such as the land - module area ratio) affect the techno - economy?**
- It analyzes the impact of AV systems with different densities (Full Density FD, Half Density HD, One - third Density TD) on crop yield and energy yield.

5. **What are the Feed - in Tariffs (FIT) required for crops with different market values?**
- For high - value and low - value crops, the paper calculates the proportion of FIT increase required to achieve an 80% food - energy output threshold.

6. **Given the system design and food - energy output thresholds, how do CT schemes perform in different locations around the world?**
- Through a case study (Punjab, Pakistan), the paper demonstrates the applicability of CT schemes under specific geographical locations and climatic conditions.

### Core Objectives
The main objective of the paper is to develop a comprehensive techno - economic model for evaluating and optimizing CT schemes in AV systems. Through this model, the authors hope to provide decision - support for policymakers and investors and promote the application of AV technology worldwide.

### Key Formulas Involved
The following are some of the key formulas used in the paper and their meanings:

1. **Price - Performance Ratio (PPR)**:
\[
ppr=\frac{p}{pb}=\frac{p'}{pb'}
\]
where \(p'\) and \(pb'\) are the normalized price and performance gains respectively.

2. **Normalized Price (\(p'\))**:
\[
p'=\left(\frac{c_{M,AV}}{c_{M,GMPV}}\right)+\left(\frac{\epsilon A_{LM,AV}}{M_L c_{L,AV}/c_{L,GMPV}}\right)-\left(\frac{A_{LM,GMPV}}{M_L + 1}\right)Y_{PV}
\]

3. **Normalized Performance Gain (\(pb'\))**:
\[
pb'=\frac{pb}{A_{M,AV}\cdot c_{M,GMPV}/\chi}=A_{LM,AV}\left(\frac{Y_{crop}\cdot P_{c,fullsun}}{A_L\cdot c_{M,GMPV}/\chi}\right)
\]

4. **Energy Output Ratio (\(Y_{PV}\))**:
\[
Y_{PV}=\frac{\text{Annual unit - module - area energy production of the AV system}}{\text{Annual unit - module - area energy production of the standard fixed - tilt GMPV system}}
\]

Through these formulas, the paper quantifies the performance of CT schemes in terms of techno - economy and provides guidance for practical applications.