Abstract:In studies of gene regulation, it is often tacitly assumed that the interactions between transcriptional regulators and their target promoters are finely tuned to ensure condition-appropriate gene expression of the targets. However, how natural selection might evolve such precise regulation from an initial state without regulation, is rarely discussed. In addition, the accuracy of gene regulation is affected by noise in gene expression [1]. Expression noise varies greatly across genes [2?5], suggesting that natural selection has affected noise levels, but the role of expression noise in gene regulation is currently poorly understood [6]. Here we present a combination of experimental evidence and theoretical modeling showing that the transmission of expression noise from regulators to their targets can function as a rudimentary form of gene regulation that facilitates the evolution of more finely tuned gene regulation. To assess how natural selection has affected transcriptional noise in E. coli, we evolved a large set of synthetic promoters under carefully controlled selective conditions and found, surprisingly, that native E. coli promoters show no signs of having been selected for minimizing their noise. Instead, a subset of native promoters, which are characterized by high expression plasticity and high numbers of regulatory inputs, show elevated noise levels. A general theoretical model, which recognizes that target genes are not only affected by the condition-dependent activities of their regulators, but also by the regulators? noise, explains these observations. Noise transmission from regulators to their targets is favored by selection whenever regulation is imprecise, and may even constitute the main function of coupling a promoter to a regulator. Our theory provides a novel framework for understanding the evolution of gene regulation, demonstrating that in many situations expression noise is not the mere unwanted side-effect of regulatory interactions, but a beneficial function that is key to the evolvability of regulatory interactions.

Noise robustness and metabolic load determine the principles of central dogma regulation

Noise robustness and metabolic load determine the principles of central dogma regulation

The one-message-per-cell-cycle rule: A conserved minimum transcription level for essential genes

Ribosome demand links transcriptional bursts to protein expression noise

Noise Minimization in Eukaryotic Gene Expression

Division rate, cell size and proteome allocation: impact on gene expression noise and implications for the dynamics of genetic circuits

Cis-Regulatory Logic Produces Gene-Expression Noise Describing Phenotypic Heterogeneity in Bacteria

Using Gene Expression Noise to Understand Gene Regulation

A bottom-up approach to gene regulation

Uncoupling gene expression noise along the central dogma using genome engineered human cell lines

Noise in gene expression may be a choice of cellular system

Protein overabundance is driven by growth robustness

Deterministic and stochastic descriptions of gene expression dynamics

Mechanical Bounds to Transcriptional Noise

Propagation of stochastic fluctuations in RNA polymerase abundance in constitutive gene expression

Physiologically Shrinking the Solution Space of a Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Genome-Scale Model Suggests the Role of the Metabolic Network in Shaping Gene Expression Noise

Post-transcriptional regulation of noise in protein distributions during gene expression

Expression noise facilitates the evolution of gene regulation