Abstract:Model merging aims to combine multiple expert models into a more capable single model, offering benefits such as reduced storage and serving costs, improved generalization, and support for decentralized model development. Despite its promise, previous studies have primarily focused on merging a few small models. This leaves many unanswered questions about the effect of scaling model size and how it interplays with other key factors -- like the base model quality and number of expert models -- , to affect the merged model's performance. This work systematically evaluates the utility of model merging at scale, examining the impact of these different factors. We experiment with merging fully fine-tuned models using 4 popular merging methods -- Averaging, Task~Arithmetic, Dare, and TIES -- across model sizes ranging from 1B-64B parameters and merging up to 8 different expert models. We evaluate the merged models on both held-in tasks, i.e., the expert's training tasks, and zero-shot generalization to unseen held-out tasks. Our experiments provide several new insights about model merging at scale and the interplay between different factors. First, we find that merging is more effective when experts are created from strong base models, i.e., models with good zero-shot performance. Second, larger models facilitate easier merging. Third merging consistently improves generalization capabilities. Notably, when merging 8 large expert models, the merged models often generalize better compared to the multitask trained models. Fourth, we can better merge more expert models when working with larger models. Fifth, different merging methods behave very similarly at larger scales. Overall, our findings shed light on some interesting properties of model merging while also highlighting some limitations. We hope that this study will serve as a reference point on large-scale merging for upcoming research.

Model Merging by Uncertainty-Based Gradient Matching

Merging Models with Fisher-Weighted Averaging

Rethinking Weight-Averaged Model-merging

Merging by Matching Models in Task Parameter Subspaces

Merging in a Bottle: Differentiable Adaptive Merging (DAM) and the Path from Averaging to Automation

Soft Merging: A Flexible and Robust Soft Model Merging Approach for Enhanced Neural Network Performance

ATM: Improving Model Merging by Alternating Tuning and Merging

MAP: Low-compute Model Merging with Amortized Pareto Fronts via Quadratic Approximation

Weight Scope Alignment: A Frustratingly Easy Method for Model Merging

Enhancing Model Agnostic Meta-Learning via Gradient Similarity Loss

Great Models Think Alike: Improving Model Reliability via Inter-Model Latent Agreement

What Matters for Model Merging at Scale?

How to Weight Multitask Finetuning? Fast Previews via Bayesian Model-Merging

Revisiting Permutation Symmetry for Merging Models between Different Datasets

Knowledge Fusion By Evolving Weights of Language Models

Training-Free Pretrained Model Merging

Merging uncertainty sets via majority vote

NegMerge: Consensual Weight Negation for Strong Machine Unlearning

Twin-Merging: Dynamic Integration of Modular Expertise in Model Merging

Mix Data or Merge Models? Optimizing for Diverse Multi-Task Learning

Toward Data Efficient Model Merging between Different Datasets without Performance Degradation