Abstract:The rising attention to the spreading of fake news and unsubstantiated rumors on online social media and the pivotal role played by confirmation bias led researchers to investigate different aspects of the phenomenon. Experimental evidence showed that confirmatory information gets accepted even if containing deliberately false claims while dissenting information is mainly ignored or might even increase group polarization. It seems reasonable that, to address misinformation problem properly, we have to understand the main determinants behind content consumption and the emergence of narratives on online social media. In this paper we address such a challenge by focusing on the discussion around the Italian Constitutional Referendum by conducting a quantitative, cross-platform analysis on both Facebook public pages and Twitter accounts. We observe the spontaneous emergence of well-separated communities on both platforms. Such a segregation is completely spontaneous, since no categorization of contents was performed a priori. By exploring the dynamics behind the discussion, we find that users tend to restrict their attention to a specific set of Facebook pages/Twitter accounts. Finally, taking advantage of automatic topic extraction and sentiment analysis techniques, we are able to identify the most controversial topics inside and across both platforms. We measure the distance between how a certain topic is presented in the posts/tweets and the related emotional response of users. Our results provide interesting insights for the understanding of the evolution of the core narratives behind different echo chambers and for the early detection of massive viral phenomena around false claims.

Experimenting AI Technologies for Disinformation Combat: the IDMO Project

IRMA: the 335-million-word Italian coRpus for studying MisinformAtion

Mapping automatic social media information disorder. The role of bots and AI in spreading misleading information in society

Artificial Intelligence in Automated Detection of Disinformation: A Thematic Analysis

The Impact of Disinformation on a Controversial Debate on Social Media

The defalsif-AI project: protecting critical infrastructures against disinformation and fake news

AI "News" Content Farms Are Easy to Make and Hard to Detect: A Case Study in Italian

AI and the Future of Disinformation Campaigns: Part 2: A Threat Model

Automated Classification of Fake News Spreaders to Break the Misinformation Chain

FakeNewsLab: Experimental Study on Biases and Pitfalls Preventing us from Distinguishing True from False News

MisinfoEval: Generative AI in the Era of "Alternative Facts"

Synthetic Lies: Understanding AI-Generated Misinformation and Evaluating Algorithmic and Human Solutions

Public discourse and news consumption on online social media: A quantitative, cross-platform analysis of the Italian Referendum

The Effects of AI-based Credibility Indicators on the Detection and Spread of Misinformation under Social Influence

The E�ects of AI-based Credibility Indicators on the Detection and Spread of Misinformation under Social Influence

Dataset for multimodal fake news detection and verification tasks

Automatic detection of influential actors in disinformation networks

Merging AI Incidents Research with Political Misinformation Research: Introducing the Political Deepfakes Incidents Database

HoaxItaly: a collection of Italian disinformation and fact-checking stories shared on Twitter in 2019

Emotional Manipulation Through Prompt Engineering Amplifies Disinformation Generation in AI Large Language Models

Evaluating the Efficacy of Large Language Models in Detecting Fake News: A Comparative Analysis