Abstract:By highlighting important features that contribute to model prediction, visual saliency is used as a natural form to interpret the working mechanism of deep neural networks. Numerous methods have been proposed to achieve better saliency results. However, we find that previous visual saliency methods are not reliable enough to provide meaningful interpretation through a simple sanity check: saliency methods are required to explain the output of non-maximum prediction classes, which are usually not ground-truth classes. For example, let the methods interpret an image of "dog" given a wrong class label "fish" as the query. This procedure can test whether these methods reliably interpret model's predictions based on existing features that appear in the data. Our experiments show that previous methods failed to pass the test by generating similar saliency maps or scattered patterns. This false saliency response can be dangerous in certain scenarios, such as medical diagnosis. We find that these failure cases are mainly due to the attribution vanishing and adversarial noise within these methods. In order to learn reliable visual saliency, we propose a simple method that requires the output of the model to be close to the original output while learning an explanatory saliency mask. To enhance the smoothness of the optimized saliency masks, we then propose a simple Hierarchical Attribution Fusion (HAF) technique. In order to fully evaluate the reliability of visual saliency methods, we propose a new task Disturbed Weakly Supervised Object Localization (D-WSOL) to measure whether these methods can correctly attribute the model's output to existing features. Experiments show that previous methods fail to meet this standard, and our approach helps to improve the reliability by suppressing false saliency responses. After observing a significant layout difference in saliency masks between real and adversarial samples. we propose to train a simple CNN on these learned hierarchical attribution masks to distinguish adversarial samples. Experiments show that our method can improve detection performance over other approaches significantly.

What Do Deep Saliency Models Learn about Visual Attention?

Deep saliency models learn low-, mid-, and high-level features to predict scene attention

Weakly Supervised Visual Saliency Prediction

Saliency Prediction in the Deep Learning Era: Successes and Limitations

Review of Visual Saliency Prediction: Development Process from Neurobiological Basis to Deep Models

CSA-Net: Deep Cross-Complementary Self Attention and Modality-Specific Preservation for Saliency Detection

A Deep Model of Visual Attention for Saliency Detection on 3D Objects

Semantic and Contrast-Aware Saliency

Learning Reliable Visual Saliency for Model Explanations

A Bayesian model for visual salience learning

Deep supervised visual saliency model addressing low-level features

An Integrated Model for Effective Saliency Prediction

Beyond Saliency: Understanding Convolutional Neural Networks from Saliency Prediction on Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation

A biologically inspired computational model for image saliency detection.

Revisiting Video Saliency Prediction in the Deep Learning Era

Audiovisual Saliency Prediction Via Deep Learning

Learning to Model Task-Oriented Attention

Saliency Prediction on Omnidirectional Images with Brain-Like Shallow Neural Network.

ADINet: Attention-guided Dual-Branch Integration Network for Atypical Visual Saliency Prediction

Saliency Based on Cortex-Like Mechanisms.

A Psychophysically Oriented Saliency Map Prediction Model