Abstract:This paper describes a fundamental and empirically conspicuous problem inherent to surveys of human feelings and opinions in which subjective responses are elicited on numerical scales. The paper also proposes a solution. The problem is a tendency by some individuals — particularly those with low levels of education — to simplify the response scale by considering only a subset of possible responses such as the lowest, middle, and highest. In principle, this "focal value rounding" (FVR) behavior renders invalid even the weak ordinality assumption often used in analysis of such data. With "happiness" or life satisfaction data as an example, descriptive methods and a multinomial logit model both show that the effect is large and that education and, to a lesser extent, income level are predictors of FVR behavior. A model simultaneously accounting for the underlying wellbeing and for the degree of FVR is able to estimate the latent subjective wellbeing, i.e. the counterfactual full-scale responses for all respondents, the biases associated with traditional estimates, and the fraction of respondents who exhibit FVR. Addressing this problem helps to resolve a longstanding puzzle in the life satisfaction literature, namely that the returns to education, after adjusting for income, appear to be small or negative. Due to the same econometric problem, the marginal utility of income in a subjective wellbeing sense has been consistently underestimated.

Estimating Individual Responses when Tomorrow Matters

Past and Future: Backward and Forward Discounting

Dynamic Decisions Under Subjective Expectations: A Structural Analysis

Estimating heterogeneous effects: Applications to labor economics

The econometrics of happiness: Are we underestimating the returns to education and income?

Forecasting euro area inflation using a huge panel of survey expectations

Revisiting Event-Study Designs: Robust and Efficient Estimation

Estimation with Aggregate Shocks

Production function estimation using subjective expectations data

How Important is Methodology for the Estimates of the Determinants of Happiness?

Earn More Tomorrow: Overconfidence, Income Expectations, and Consumer Indebtedness

Fiscal Policy and MPC Heterogeneity

Regressions under Adverse Conditions

Discounting the Future: On Climate Change, Ambiguity Aversion and Epstein–Zin Preferences

Intertemporal Choice and the Cross-Sectional Variance of Marginal Utility

Question-Order Effects on Judgements under Uncertainty

An Empirical Analysis of Earnings and Employment Risk

Expectile and M-quantile regression for panel data

Estimating risk preferences integrating insurance choices with subjective beliefs