Abstract:In this paper we establish a mathematical framework for a range of inverse problems for functions, given a finite set of noisy observations. The problems are hence underdetermined and are often ill-posed. We study these problems from the viewpoint of Bayesian statistics, with the resulting posterior probability measure being defined on a space of functions. We develop an abstract framework for such problems which facilitates application of an infinite-dimensional version of Bayes theorem, leads to a well-posedness result for the posterior measure (continuity in a suitable probability metric with respect to changes in data), and also leads to a theory for the existence of maximizing the posterior probability (MAP) estimators for such Bayesian inverse problems on function space. A central idea underlying these results is that continuity properties and bounds on the forward model guide the choice of the prior measure for the inverse problem, leading to the desired results on well-posedness and MAP estimators; the PDE analysis and probability theory required are thus clearly dileneated, allowing a straightforward derivation of results. We show that the abstract theory applies to some concrete applications of interest by studying problems arising from data assimilation in fluid mechanics. The objective is to make inference about the underlying velocity field, on the basis of either Eulerian or Lagrangian observations. We study problems without model error, in which case the inference is on the initial condition, and problems with model error in which case the inference is on the initial condition and on the driving noise process or, equivalently, on the entire time-dependent velocity field. In order to undertake a relatively uncluttered mathematical analysis we consider the two-dimensional Navier–Stokes equation on a torus. The case of Eulerian observations—direct observations of the velocity field itself—is then a model for weather forecasting. The case of Lagrangian observations—observations of passive tracers advected by the flow—is then a model for data arising in oceanography. The methodology which we describe herein may be applied to many other inverse problems in which it is of interest to find, given observations, an infinite-dimensional object, such as the initial condition for a PDE. A similar approach might be adopted, for example, to determine an appropriate mathematical setting for the inverse problem of determining an unknown tensor arising in a constitutive law for a PDE, given observations of the solution. The paper is structured so that the abstract theory can be read independently of the particular problems in fluid mechanics which are subsequently studied by application of the theory.

Inverse problems in elastohydrodynamics

Inverse asymptotic treatment: capturing discontinuities in fluid flows via equation modification

Elastohydrodynamic interactions in soft hydraulic knots

Revisiting density-based topology optimization for fluid-structure-interaction problems

On the boundary layer structure near a highly permeable porous interface

Non-Newtonian fluid–structure interactions: Static response of a microchannel due to internal flow of a power-law fluid

Less is often more: Applied inverse problems using -forward models.

Shape Inverse Problem for the Two‐dimensional Unsteady Stokes Flow

The inverse problem of permeability identification for multiphase flow in porous media

Some New Evolutions on the Inverse Problems in Elastodynamics

Bayesian inverse Navier-Stokes problems: joint flow field reconstruction and parameter learning

Inverse Problems for One-Dimensional Fluid-Solid Interaction Models

Curved geometries from planar director fields - Solving the two-dimensional inverse problem

Enhancement of flow measurements using fluid-dynamic constraints

Identification of rheological parameters for shallow water flows of viscoplastic fluids using elevation hydrographs

Non-Newtonian fluid-structure interaction: Flow of a viscoelastic Oldroyd-B fluid in a deformable channel

Reconstructing relaxed configurations in elastic bodies: Mathematical formulations and numerical methods for cardiac modeling

Bayesian inverse problems for functions and applications to fluid mechanics

A classical mistake and what it tells us. How to do better with an action principle for Hydro and Thermodynamics