Abstract:Recent large-scale structure (LSS) surveys have revealed a persistent tension in the value of $S_8$ compared to predictions from the standard cosmological model. This tension may suggest the need for new physics beyond the standard model, but an accurate characterisation of baryonic effects is essential to avoid biases. Although some studies indicate that baryonic effects are too small to resolve this tension, others propose that more aggressive feedback mechanisms could reconcile differences between cosmic microwave background (CMB) measurements and low-redshift LSS observations. In this paper, we investigate the role of baryonic effects in alleviating the $S_8$ tension. We extend the SP(k) model (Salcido et al. 2023), which was trained on hundreds of cosmological hydrodynamical simulations to map the suppression of the matter power spectrum to the baryon fraction in groups and clusters, to predict the required baryon fraction for a given $P(k)$ suppression. We then compare predictions from recent cosmic shear (weak lensing) analyses with the latest baryon budget measurements from X-ray and weak gravitational lensing studies. Our findings show that studies marginalising over baryonic effects while fixing cosmological parameters to a Planck-like cosmology predict strong $P(k)$ suppression and baryon fractions that are much lower than existing low-redshift baryon budget estimates of galaxy groups and clusters. Conversely, most studies that marginalise over both cosmological parameters and baryonic effects imply baryon fractions that are consistent with observations but lower values of $S_8$ than inferred from the CMB. Unless the observed baryon fractions are biased high by a factor of several, these results suggest that a mechanism beyond baryonic physics alone is required to modify or slow down the growth of structure in the universe in order to resolve the $S_8$ tension.

Probing solutions to the $S_8$ tension with galaxy clustering

The Sigma-8 Tension is a Drag

Relieving the $S_8$ Tension: Exploring the Surface-type DBI Model as a Dark Matter Paradigm

Quantifying the $S_8$ tension and evidence for interacting dark energy from redshift-space distortion measurements

Hints of a physical origin for the S 8 tension

Constraints on S 8 from a full-scale and full-shape analysis of redshift-space clustering and galaxy–galaxy lensing in BOSS

Probing interacting dark sector models with future weak lensing-informed galaxy cluster abundance constraints from SPT-3G and CMB-S4

Implications of feedback solutions to the $S_8$ tension for the baryon fractions of galaxy groups and clusters

Full-shape BOSS constraints on dark matter interacting with dark radiation and lifting the $S_8$ tension

Late Time Modification of Structure Growth and the S8 Tension

Investigating the Hubble Tension and $σ_8$ Discrepancy in f(Q) Cosmology

A non-linear solution to the $S_8$ tension II: Analysis of DES Year 3 cosmic shear

A Step in Understanding the $S_8$ Tension

Cosmographic view on the $H_0$ and $σ_8$ tensions

Role of the Hubble Scale in the Weak Lensing vs. CMB Tension

Investigating the Hubble tension and σ 8 discrepancy in f(Q) cosmology

The FLAMINGO project: revisiting the $S_8$ tension and the role of baryonic physics

Baryon-free $S_8$ tension with Stage IV cosmic shear surveys

A visual tool for assessing tension-resolving models in the $H_0$-$σ_8$ plane

The weak, the strong and the ugly -- A comparative analysis of interacting stepped dark radiation