Abstract:In this feature, we review the current capabilities of local electron correlation methods up to the coupled cluster model with single, double, and perturbative triple excitations [CCSD(T)], which is a gold standard in quantum chemistry. The main computational aspects of the local method types are assessed from the perspective of applications, but the focus is kept on how to achieve chemical accuracy ( i.e. , <1 kcal mol −1 uncertainty), as well as on the broad scope of chemical problems made accessible. The performance of state-of-the-art methods is also compared, including the most employed DLPNO and, in particular, our local natural orbital (LNO) CCSD(T) approach. The high accuracy and efficiency of the LNO method makes chemically accurate CCSD(T) computations accessible for molecules of hundreds of atoms with resources affordable to a broad computational community (days on a single CPU and 10–100 GB of memory). Recent developments in LNO-CCSD(T) enable systematic convergence and robust error estimates even for systems of complicated electronic structure or larger size (up to 1000 atoms). The predictive power of current local CCSD(T) methods, usually at about 1 – 2 order of magnitude higher cost than hybrid density functional theory (DFT), has become outstanding on the palette of computational chemistry applicable for molecules of practical interest. We also review more than 50 LNO-based and other advanced local-CCSD(T) applications for realistic, large systems across molecular interactions as well as main group, transition metal, bio-, and surface chemistry. The examples show that properly executed local-CCSD(T) can contribute to binding, reaction equilibrium, rate constants, etc. which are able to match measurements within the error estimates. These applications demonstrate that modern, open-access, and broadly affordable local methods, such as LNO-CCSD(T), already enable predictive computations and atomistic insight for complicated, real-life molecular processes in realistic environments.

Which model density is best in pair natural orbital local correlation theory?

Which model density is best in pair natural orbital local correlation theory?

Orbital entanglement and correlation from pCCD-tailored Coupled Cluster wave functions

Applications of a perturbation-aware local correlation method to coupled cluster linear response properties

Local electronic correlation in multicomponent Møller-Plesset perturbation theory

Assessing the Global Natural Orbital Functional Approximation on Model Systems with Strong Correlation

Accurate and Efficient Open-Source Implementation of Domain-Based Local Pair Natural Orbital (DLPNO) Coupled-Cluster Theory Using a t1-Transformed Hamiltonian

Assessing the domain-based local pair natural orbital (DLPNO) approximation for non-covalent interactions in sizable supramolecular complexes

Optimized Pair Natural Orbitals for the Coupled Cluster Methods.

Accuracy of Charge Densities in Electronic Structure Calculations

State-of-the-art local correlation methods enable affordable gold standard quantum chemistry for up to hundreds of atoms

Quantification of electron correlation effects: Quantum Information Theory vs Method of Increments

The Delicate Balance of Static and Dynamic Electron Correlation

An efficient method for strongly correlated electrons in one dimension

Quantifying errors of the electron-proton/muon correlation functionals through the Kohn-Sham inversion of a two-component model system

Analysis of two-orbital correlations in wavefunctions restricted to electron-pair states

Basis-Set Limit CCSD(T) Energies for Large Molecules with Local Natural Orbitals and Reduced-Scaling Basis-Set Corrections

Linear-scaling local natural orbital CCSD(T) approach for open-shell systems: algorithm, benchmarks, and large-scale applications

Triple electron-electron-proton excitations and second-order approximations in nuclear-electronic orbital coupled cluster methods