Abstract:This paper showcases two case studies for automated data transfer in digital twins. One uses a tailor‐made infrastructure for data transfer between the facility and digital twin, the other uses edge computing. The digital twin objective should determine the required simulation frequency and, thus, sets boundaries on suitable implementation methods. Digital twins have been gaining an immense interest in various fields over the last decade. Bringing conventional process simulation models into (near) real time are thought to provide valuable insights for operators, decision makers, and stakeholders in many industries. The objective of this paper is to describe two methods for implementing digital twins at water resource recovery facilities and highlight and discuss their differences and preferable use situations, with focus on the automated data transfer from the real process. Case 1 uses a tailor‐made infrastructure for automated data transfer between the facility and the digital twin. Case 2 uses edge computing for rapid automated data transfer. The data transfer lag from process to digital twin is low compared to the simulation frequency in both systems. The presented digital twin objectives can be achieved using either of the presented methods. The method of Case 1 is better suited for automatic recalibration of model parameters, although workarounds exist for the method in Case 2. The method of Case 2 is well suited for objectives such as soft sensors due to its integration with the SCADA system and low latency. The objective of the digital twin, and the required latency of the system, should guide the choice of method. Practitioner Points Various methods can be used for automated data transfer between the physical system and a digital twin. Delays in the data transfer differ depending on implementation method. The digital twin objective determines the required simulation frequency. Implementation method should be chosen based on the required simulation frequency.

Timeseries on IIoT Platforms: Requirements and Survey for Digital Twins in Process Industry

Shaping the future of industry: Understanding the dynamics of industrial digital twins

A comprehensive survey on digital twin for future networks and emerging Internet of Things industry

A Survey on Digital Twin for Industrial Internet of Things: Applications, Technologies and Tools

Digital Twin for Verification and Validation of Industrial Automation Systems – a Survey

Industrial Insights on Digital Twins in Manufacturing: Application Landscape, Current Practices, and Future Needs

IoTwins: Toward Implementation of Distributed Digital Twins in Industry 4.0 Settings

Digital Twins of Business Processes as Enablers for IT / OT Integration

Pipeline for ontology-based modeling and automated deployment of digital twins for planning and control of manufacturing systems

On the Role of Digital Twins in Data Spaces

Digital twins in process engineering: An overview on computational and numerical methods

When Digital Twin Meets Network Softwarization in the Industrial IoT: Real-Time Requirements Case Study

Digital Twin in Industries: A Comprehensive Survey

Utilising Digital Twins to Bolster the Sustainability of Logistics Processes in Industry 4.0

Digital Twins in Power Systems: A Proposal for a Definition

From Sensors to Digital Twins toward an Iterative Approach for Existing Manufacturing Systems

A Data-Driven Digital Twin Network Architecture in the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) Applications

Automated data transfer for digital twin applications: Two case studies

DES and IIoT fusion approach towards real-time synchronization of physical and digital components in manufacturing processes

Digital Twin and Internet of Things—Current Standards Landscape

Promoting Digital Twin Technology Application for Process Industry: A Novel Generation Modelling Platform and Its Implementations