Abstract:Equilibria in auctions can be very difficult to analyze, beyond the symmetric environments where revenue equivalence renders the analysis straightforward. This paper takes a robust approach to evaluating the equilibria of auctions. Rather than identify the equilibria of an auction under specific environmental conditions, it considers worst-case analysis, where an auction is evaluated according to the worst environment and worst equilibrium in that environment. It identifies a non-equilibrium property of auctions that governs whether or not their worst-case equilibria are good for welfare and revenue. This property is easy to analyze, can be refined from data, and composes across markets where multiple auctions are run simultaneously.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to address the complexity of equilibrium analysis in the auction environment, especially in asymmetric environments or situations with incomplete information. Specifically, the author proposes a robust method to evaluate the equilibrium of auctions, rather than analyzing the equilibrium under specific environmental conditions. This method focuses on how auctions perform in the worst - case scenario (i.e., the worst environment and the worst equilibrium), and introduces a non - equilibrium property to judge whether the welfare and revenue of auctions are good in the worst - case scenario.
### Main problems of the paper
1. **Complexity of auction equilibrium**:
- In a symmetric environment, due to revenue equivalence, the analysis of auctions is relatively simple.
- However, in more complex, asymmetric environments, the equilibrium analysis of auctions becomes very difficult.
2. **Robustness analysis**:
- Traditional auction analysis usually depends on specific environmental assumptions, and these assumptions may not always hold in practical applications.
- Therefore, a method is needed to evaluate the performance of auctions in various different environments, especially in the worst - case scenario.
### Solutions
- **Robustness evaluation**: The paper proposes a robust method to evaluate the performance of auctions by considering the worst - case environment and equilibrium.
- **Competitive Efficiency (\(\mu\))**: A new concept - competitive efficiency - is defined, which measures how the competitiveness of the auction mechanism is converted into revenue. Competitive efficiency is a non - equilibrium property, which is easy to analyze and can be extracted from data.
- **Individual Efficiency (\(\eta\))**: Another key concept is individual efficiency, which measures the impact of incomplete information on the performance of auctions.
### Formula representation
- Competitive efficiency \(\mu\) is defined as:
\[
\text{Rev}(M, b)\geq\mu\sum_i T_i(y_i)
\]
where \(\text{Rev}(M, b)\) is the revenue of the auction mechanism \(M\) under the bid vector \(b\), \(T_i(y_i)\) is the threshold surplus of the \(i\) - th participant, and \(y_i\) is the amount of resources allocated to the \(i\) - th participant.
- Individual efficiency \(\eta\) measures the best - response problem of participants in the face of uncertainty and incomplete information, depending on the equilibrium concept (such as pure Nash equilibrium or Bayesian Nash equilibrium) and the payment format (such as winner - pays - bid or all - pay format).
### Conclusion
By introducing the concepts of competitive efficiency and individual efficiency, the paper provides a robust method to evaluate the performance of auction mechanisms in various environments. This method is not only applicable to a single auction, but can also be extended to markets where multiple auctions are running simultaneously.