Can Language Models Employ the Socratic Method? Experiments with Code Debugging

Erfan Al-Hossami,Razvan Bunescu,Justin Smith,Ryan Teehan

2023-10-05

Abstract:When employing the Socratic method of teaching, instructors guide students toward solving a problem on their own rather than providing the solution directly. While this strategy can substantially improve learning outcomes, it is usually time-consuming and cognitively demanding. Automated Socratic conversational agents can augment human instruction and provide the necessary scale, however their development is hampered by the lack of suitable data for training and evaluation. In this paper, we introduce a manually created dataset of multi-turn Socratic advice that is aimed at helping a novice programmer fix buggy solutions to simple computational problems. The dataset is then used for benchmarking the Socratic debugging abilities of a number of language models, ranging from fine-tuning the instruction-based text-to-text transformer Flan-T5 to zero-shot and chain of thought prompting of the much larger GPT-4. The code and datasets are made freely available for research at the link below. <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://github.com/taisazero/socratic-debugging-benchmark" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>

Computation and Language,Computers and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem this paper attempts to address is how to utilize language models (such as GPT-3.5 and GPT-4) to implement the Socratic teaching method, particularly in the application of code debugging. Specifically, the authors focus on developing a dataset capable of generating Socratic guidance dialogues aimed at helping novice programmers fix errors in simple programming problems. Through this approach, the researchers hope to automate teaching tasks, improve the learning outcomes of novice programmers, and reduce the workload of teaching staff.

### Main Problem Breakdown:
1. **Dataset Creation**: To train and evaluate language models capable of generating Socratic guidance dialogues, the authors manually created a dataset containing multi-turn dialogues. These dialogues simulate how a teacher guides a student to discover and fix errors in their code.
2. **Model Evaluation**: The authors used this dataset to evaluate the performance of different language models (including GPT-3.5 and GPT-4) in generating Socratic guidance dialogues. Evaluation metrics include Precision, Recall, and F1 score.
3. **Task Definition**: The paper defines the Socratic debugging task in detail, including the input (problem description, test cases, student's erroneous code, error description, and fix) and the output (Socratic guidance dialogue).
4. **Experimental Methods**: The authors used zero-shot and Chain of Thought (CoT) prompting methods to generate Socratic guidance dialogues and compared the performance of different models.

### Main Contributions of the Paper:
- **Dataset**: Created a high-quality manually annotated dataset containing 151 main dialogues and 3,495 utterances for training and evaluating models that generate Socratic guidance dialogues.
- **Model Evaluation**: Systematically evaluated the capabilities of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in generating Socratic guidance dialogues, demonstrating the significant advantage of GPT-4 in this task.
- **Method Innovation**: Introduced the Chain of Thought (CoT) method to decompose the task of generating Socratic guidance dialogues, improving model performance.

### Conclusion:
Through this study, the authors demonstrated that large language models (especially GPT-4) have the potential to generate Socratic guidance dialogues effectively, assisting novice programmers in code debugging. This achievement provides a new direction for the future development of educational technology, particularly in automating teaching and supporting personalized learning.