Abstract:Self-supervised learning (SSL) is a popular paradigm for representation learning. Recent multiview methods can be classified as sample-contrastive, dimension-contrastive, or asymmetric network-based, with each family having its own approach to avoiding informational collapse. While these families converge to solutions of similar quality, it can be empirically shown that some methods are epoch-inefficient and require longer training to reach a target performance. Two main approaches to improving efficiency are covariance eigenvalue regularization and using more views. However, these two approaches are difficult to combine due to the computational complexity of computing eigenvalues. We present the objective function FroSSL which reconciles both approaches while avoiding eigendecomposition entirely. FroSSL works by minimizing covariance Frobenius norms to avoid collapse and minimizing mean-squared error to achieve augmentation invariance. We show that FroSSL reaches competitive accuracies more quickly than any other SSL method and provide theoretical and empirical support that this faster convergence is due to how FroSSL affects the eigenvalues of the embedding covariance matrices. We also show that FroSSL learns competitive representations on linear probe evaluation when used to train a ResNet-18 on several datasets, including STL-10, Tiny ImageNet, and ImageNet-100.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper mainly addresses the efficiency issues in Self-Supervised Learning (SSL), particularly how to reduce the training time required to achieve competitive performance. The core contribution of the research is the proposal of a new objective function, FroSSL (Frobenius Norm Minimization for efficient multiview self-supervised learning), aimed at improving the training efficiency of SSL methods. ### Research Background - **Objective of Self-Supervised Learning**: To learn useful representations without explicit labels. - **Existing Problems**: - Avoiding information collapse (i.e., all samples being encoded as the same point). - Slow convergence, typically requiring a large number of training iterations to reach performance levels comparable to supervised learning. - **Categories of Existing Methods**: - Sample contrastive methods: Learn representations by contrasting positive and negative examples. - Dimensional contrastive methods: Avoid information collapse by reducing redundancy between feature dimensions. - Asymmetric network methods: Prevent information collapse by imposing constraints on the network structure. ### Main Contributions 1. **FroSSL Objective Function**: Combines the advantages of dimensional contrastive methods and avoids the complexity of computing eigenvalues, thereby improving training efficiency. - Uses Frobenius norm minimization of the covariance matrix to avoid information collapse. - Uses Mean Squared Error (MSE) to achieve augmentation invariance. 2. **Theoretical Framework**: Proposes a unified framework that consolidates dimensional contrastive methods and analyzes how these methods can reduce training time by increasing the number of views or improving eigenvalue dynamics. 3. **Empirical Analysis**: Demonstrates the performance of FroSSL on multiple datasets, including STL-10, Tiny ImageNet, and ImageNet-100, proving that it can achieve competitive accuracy more quickly. ### Problems Addressed - Improving the training efficiency of SSL methods, especially reducing the training time required to reach a given performance level. - Combining the use of more views and improving eigenvalue dynamics to accelerate the training process. - Through theoretical analysis and experiments, proving that the proposed FroSSL method can learn high-quality representations in a shorter time. ### Conclusion By introducing the FroSSL objective function, the paper effectively addresses the inefficiency and slow convergence issues in self-supervised learning, providing a new approach to accelerate the training process of self-supervised learning.

FroSSL: Frobenius Norm Minimization for Efficient Multiview Self-Supervised Learning

Learning Where to Learn in Cross-View Self-Supervised Learning

Addressing Sample Inefficiency in Multi-View Representation Learning

Views Can Be Deceiving: Improved SSL Through Feature Space Augmentation

Understanding self-supervised Learning Dynamics without Contrastive Pairs

Rethinking Self-Supervised Learning: Small is Beautiful

Data-Efficient Contrastive Self-supervised Learning: Most Beneficial Examples for Supervised Learning Contribute the Least

On Improving the Algorithm-, Model-, and Data- Efficiency of Self-Supervised Learning

Scalable Graph Self-Supervised Learning

ReSSL: Relational Self-Supervised Learning with Weak Augmentation.

The Common Stability Mechanism behind most Self-Supervised Learning Approaches

Weak Augmentation Guided Relational Self-Supervised Learning

Occam's Razor for Self Supervised Learning: What is Sufficient to Learn Good Representations?

Towards the Sparseness of Projection Head in Self-Supervised Learning.

Learning Contrastive Multi-View Graphs for Recommendation (student Abstract).

Triplet is All You Need with Random Mappings for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning

Understanding the Role of Equivariance in Self-supervised Learning

Preventing Dimensional Collapse in Self-Supervised Learning via Orthogonality Regularization

Embedding Global Contrastive and Local Location in Self-Supervised Learning

More Synergy, Less Redundancy: Exploiting Joint Mutual Information for Self-Supervised Learning

EMP-SSL: Towards Self-Supervised Learning in One Training Epoch