Abstract:Aftershocks can cause disasters again after mainshocks, which result in threat to life and economic loss. In order to avoid secondary disasters, it is necessary to predict whether aftershocks would happen in a given region. There have been studies using different features and methods to predict aftershocks spatial distribution. However, it is still unclear which are more important for aftershock prediction, input features or models; which type of features is more predictive for the prediction task. In this paper, we predict aftershock spatial distribution by combining different types of features and applying different machine learning methods. We introduce five different types of features and combine them together for prediction: the stress change sensors, their logarithmic values, the physical quantities, the magnitude of mainshocks, and the distance between the grid cell and the epicenter of mainshocks. We train different classifiers: Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine,Gradient Boosting Decision Tree, k-Nearest Neighbors, Logistic regression, and DMAP (a Deep Neural Network model). Based on the 62,811 aftershocks of 171 distinct mainshocks in the past about 40 years in China, we conduct comprehensive experiments and analyses. We find that features play a more important role for this prediction task. Using the same feature type, different classifiers obtain quite similar performance. With different features, the same model performs differently. Taking the combined features as input, we achieve the state-of-the-art performance, with an AUC of 0.9530, about 4% higher than that of DeVries et al., showing the superiority of the combined features. Among all the features, adding the distance to the stress change sensors contributes the most to improve the prediction performance. In addition, it is found that the model prediction performance varies in terms of the time spans after mainshocks and the aftershock magnitudes.

A combining earthquake forecasting model between deep learning and Epidemic-Type Aftershock Sequence (ETAS) model

Improved Earthquake Forecasting Model Based on Long-term Memory in Earthquake

Bayesian earthquake forecasting approach based on the epidemic type aftershock sequence model

Time Series and Non-Time Series Models of Earthquake Prediction Based on AETA Data: 16-Week Real Case Study

Elite GA-based feature selection of LSTM for earthquake prediction

Embracing Data Incompleteness for Better Earthquake Forecasting

Forecasting the 2016-2017 Central Apennines Earthquake Sequence with a Neural Point Process

What Are More Important for Aftershock Spatial Distribution Prediction, Features, or Models? A Case Study in China

Nonstationary ETAS models for nonstandard earthquakes

Algorithms for Fitting the Space-Time ETAS Model to Earthquake Catalog Data: A Comparative Study

Dlep: A Deep Learning Model For Earthquake Prediction

A Feature Enginering Framework for Short-term Earthquake Prediction Based on AETA Data

Modeling the Asymptotic Behavior of Higher-Order Aftershocks with Deep Learning

Long Short-Term Memory Networks for Pattern Recognition of Synthetical Complete Earthquake Catalog

An Evolutionary Model for Earthquake Prediction Considering Time-Series Evolution and Feature Extraction and Its Application

Nowcasting ETAS Earthquakes: Information Entropy of Earthquake Catalogs

Rapid Earthquake Magnitude Estimation Using Deep Learning.

A Global Earthquake Prediction Model Based on Spherical Convolutional LSTM

A Hypocentral Version of the Space–time ETAS Model

Aftershock forecasts based on incomplete earthquake catalogues: ETASI model application to the 2023 SE Türkiye earthquake sequence

A Novel Hybrid LMD-ETS-TCN Approach for Predicting Landslide Displacement Based on GPS Time Series Analysis