Abstract:The QED-C suite of Application-Oriented Benchmarks provides the ability to gauge performance characteristics of quantum computers as applied to real-world applications. Its benchmark programs sweep over a range of problem sizes and inputs, capturing key performance metrics related to the quality of results, total time of execution, and quantum gate resources consumed. In this manuscript, we investigate challenges in broadening the relevance of this benchmarking methodology to applications of greater complexity. First, we introduce a method for improving landscape coverage by varying algorithm parameters systematically, exemplifying this functionality in a new scalable HHL linear equation solver benchmark. Second, we add a VQE implementation of a Hydrogen Lattice simulation to the QED-C suite, and introduce a methodology for analyzing the result quality and run-time cost trade-off. We observe a decrease in accuracy with increased number of qubits, but only a mild increase in the execution time. Third, unique characteristics of a supervised machine-learning classification application are explored as a benchmark to gauge the extensibility of the framework to new classes of application. Applying this to a binary classification problem revealed the increase in training time required for larger anzatz circuits, and the significant classical overhead. Fourth, we add methods to include optimization and error mitigation in the benchmarking workflow which allows us to: identify a favourable trade off between approximate gate synthesis and gate noise; observe the benefits of measurement error mitigation and a form of deterministic error mitigation algorithm; and to contrast the improvement with the resulting time overhead. Looking ahead, we discuss how the benchmark framework can be instrumental in facilitating the exploration of algorithmic options and their impact on performance.

Evaluating Three Levels of Quantum Metrics on Quantum-Inspire Hardware

Extending the Q-score to an Application-level Quantum Metric Framework

A methodology for comparing and benchmarking quantum devices

QuAS: Quantum Application Score for benchmarking the utility of quantum computers

SoK: Benchmarking the Performance of a Quantum Computer

Scalable Benchmarks for Gate-Based Quantum Computers

Benchmarking Quantum Computers: Towards a Standard Performance Evaluation Approach

Benchmarking Quantum Computer Simulation Software Packages: State Vector Simulators

Quantum utility -- definition and assessment of a practical quantum advantage

A Comprehensive Cross-Model Framework for Benchmarking the Performance of Quantum Hamiltonian Simulations

Benchmarking quantum computers

Defining Standard Strategies for Quantum Benchmarks

Benchmarking simulated and physical quantum processing units using quantum and hybrid algorithms

Quantum Volume in Practice: What Users Can Expect from NISQ Devices

Quantum Algorithm Exploration using Application-Oriented Performance Benchmarks

Comparing Quantum Service Offerings

A Practical Introduction to Benchmarking and Characterization of Quantum Computers

Benchmarking the performance of quantum computing software

MQT Bench: Benchmarking Software and Design Automation Tools for Quantum Computing

Measuring the Capabilities of Quantum Computers

QuantMark: A Benchmarking API for VQE Algorithms