What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to solve the error problem caused by inaccurate prediction of scheduling parameters when nonlinear systems use Linear Parameter - Varying (LPV) models for Model Predictive Control (MPC). Specifically, the goals of the paper are: 1. **Provide deterministic error bounds**: By using the Linear Differential Inclusions (LDIs) method, deterministic error bounds between the actual state evolution and the LPV model prediction are derived. These bounds are represented in the form of polyhedral tubes, which are more accurate than the linearization method and reduce conservatism. 2. **Handle uncertainties**: In the LPV - embedded MPC framework, the prediction uncertainty of the scheduling parameter \( p \) is a major challenge. The paper provides deterministic error bounds by explicitly deriving the error dynamics and using the LDIR method, thus better handling this uncertainty. 3. **Verify the effectiveness of the method**: The effectiveness and practicality of the proposed method are verified by solving a classic control benchmark problem - the regulation problem of an unbalanced disk. ### Main contributions - **Novel error bound derivation**: For the first time, the paper clearly derives the deterministic error bounds of nonlinear systems under LPV embedding. These bounds are represented in the form of polyhedral tubes and are more accurate than the traditional linearization method. - **Theoretical analysis and method verification**: Through strict theoretical analysis, the effectiveness of the proposed method is proved and verified through a classic control problem. - **Potential for practical applications**: The method in the paper can be applied to various nonlinear control systems, especially in autonomous driving tasks that require real - time performance, and has important application prospects. ### Research background - **Control challenges of nonlinear systems**: Many interesting control applications involve nonlinear dynamics. These systems do not satisfy the superposition and scaling principles and are therefore difficult to handle. - **Advantages of LPV models**: LPV models can embed nonlinear systems into the framework of linear parameter - varying, thereby using the mature linear control theory to improve control performance. - **Complexity of MPC**: Although Nonlinear MPC (NMPC) can handle input - state constraints, solving the optimization problem is very complex, especially in real - time applications. LPV embedding can simplify this process and make it more efficient. ### Method overview 1. **Derivation of error dynamics**: First, the general error dynamic equation of the LPV system is derived. 2. **Deterministic error bounds**: Using the Linear Differential Inclusions (LDIR) method, the polyhedral bounds of the error are derived. 3. **Application verification**: The effectiveness of the proposed method is verified by solving the regulation problem of an unbalanced disk. ### Conclusion By introducing the Linear Differential Inclusions (LDIR) method, the paper successfully derives the deterministic error bounds of nonlinear systems under LPV embedding. These bounds are represented in the form of polyhedral tubes and are more accurate than the traditional linearization method, reducing conservatism. The effectiveness of the method is verified through a classic control problem, showing its potential in practical applications. Future research will further reduce conservatism, explore applications in higher - dimensional systems, and combine machine learning techniques to improve prediction accuracy.

Error Bounds in Nonlinear Model Predictive Control with Linear Differential Inclusions of Parametric-Varying Embeddings

Stochastic Error Bounds in Nonlinear Model Predictive Control with Gaussian Processes via Parameter-Varying Embeddings

Linear Mismatched Model Based Offset-Free Mpc For Nonlinear Constrained Systems With Both Stochastic And Deterministic Disturbances And Its Application To Cstr

Nonlinear learning‐based model predictive control supporting state and input dependent model uncertainty estimates

A Linear Parameter-Varying Approach to Data Predictive Control

Robust Constrained Model Predictive Control Based on Parameter-Dependent Lyapunov Functions

Model Predictive Control for LPV Models with Maximal Stabilizable Model Range

Stability and Performance Analysis of Model Predictive Control of Uncertain Linear Systems

Efficient Nonlinear Model Predictive Control by Leveraging Linear Parameter-Varying Embedding and Sequential Quadratic Programming

Interpolation Based Model Predictive Control Design for Markovian Jump Linear Systems

Sub-linear Regret in Adaptive Model Predictive Control

Security Control for LPV System With Deception Attacks via Model Predictive Control: A Dynamic Output Feedback Approach

Dynamic Output Feedback Robust MPC for Constrained Quasi-Lpv Systems with Both Polyhedral and Ellipsoidal Bounds on Estimation Error

Dynamic Output Feedback Robust Mpc Using General Polyhedral State Bounds for the Polytopic Uncertain System with Bounded Disturbance

Performance Bounds of Model Predictive Control for Unconstrained and Constrained Linear Quadratic Problems and Beyond

Model Predictive Control for Nonlinear Systems with Time‐varying Dynamics and Guaranteed Lyapunov Stability

Dual-Mode Predictive Control Of Constrained Nonlinear Sytems Via Linear Differential Inclusion

Learning-based nonlinear model predictive control with accurate uncertainty compensation

A Learning- and Scenario-based MPC Design for Nonlinear Systems in LPV Framework with Safety and Stability Guarantees.

A Linear MPC with Control Barrier Functions for Differential Drive Robots

Output Feedback Robust Model Predictive Control with Unmeasurable Model Parameters and Bounded Disturbance