Abstract:The origin of Uranus and Neptune has long been challenging to explain, due to the large orbital distances from the Sun. After a planetary embryo has been formed, the main accretion processes are likely pebble, gas and planetesimal accretion. Previous studies of Uranus and Neptune formation typically don't consider all three processes; and furthermore, do not investigate how the formation of the outer planet impacts the inner planet. In this paper we study the concurrent formation of Uranus and Neptune via both pebble, gas and planetesimal accretion. We use a dust-evolution model to predict the size and mass flux of pebbles, and derive our own fit for gas accretion. We do not include migration, but consider a wide range of formation locations between 12 and 40au. If the planetary embryos form at the same time and with the same mass, our formation model with an evolving dust population is unable to produce Uranus and Neptune analogues. This is because the mass difference between the planets and the H-He mass fractions become too high. However, if the outer planetary embryo forms earlier and/or more massive than the inner embryo, the two planets do form in a few instances when the disk is metal-rich and dissipates after a few Myr. Furthermore, our study suggests that in-situ formation is rather unlikely. Nethertheless, giant impacts and/or migration could potentially aid in the formation, and future studies including these processes could bring us one step closer to understanding how Uranus and Neptune formed.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores the formation of Uranus and Neptune, particularly the possibility of forming these two ice giants simultaneously through the accretion of pebbles, gas, and planetesimals. The paper first introduces the basic information about Uranus and Neptune and their positions in the solar system, and points out several key challenges in their formation process: 1. Uranus and Neptune are far from the Sun, making the timescale for forming cores through traditional planetesimal accretion possibly exceed the lifetime of the protoplanetary disk. 2. When considering gas accretion, it is necessary to prevent these planets from undergoing runaway gas accretion and becoming gas giants. 3. The composition of Uranus and Neptune is mainly heavy elements, with a hydrogen-helium ratio of less than 20%, which is different from the gas giants in the solar system. 4. Neptune has a higher mass than Uranus, whereas typically, planets closer to the Sun have greater mass. To address these issues, the authors constructed a model that considers the accretion processes of pebbles, gas, and planetesimals, and employs a dust evolution model to predict the size and mass flux of pebbles. The study does not consider the impact of planetary migration but examines a range of different formation locations from 12 to 40 astronomical units. The research results indicate: - If the initial embryos of Uranus and Neptune form at the same time with the same mass, it is difficult to form planets similar to Uranus and Neptune simultaneously through the accretion of pebbles, gas, and planetesimals. - When the outer planetary embryo forms earlier or is heavier than the inner planetary embryo, it is possible to form similar planets in metal-rich disks and under conditions where the disk dissipates after a few million years. - The study also points out that in-situ formation is less likely. However, giant impact events and/or migration may contribute to the formation process. Overall, the study suggests that Uranus and Neptune are unlikely to form in situ solely through the accretion of pebbles, gas, and planetesimals, and other mechanisms such as giant impacts or migration may be required.

Can Uranus and Neptune form concurrently via pebble, gas and planetesimal accretion?

Considerations on the accretion of Uranus and Neptune by mutual collisions of planetary embryos in the vicinity of Jupiter and Saturn

Accretion of Uranus and Neptune from inward-migrating planetary embryos blocked by Jupiter and Saturn

Accretion of Uranus and Neptune: confronting different giant impact scenarios

Solid Accretion onto Neptune-Mass Planets I: In-Situ Accretion and Constraints from the metallicity of Uranus and Neptune

Consequences of the simultaneous formation of giant planets by the core accretion mechanism

The formation of mini-Neptunes

Insights on the Formation Conditions of Uranus and Neptune from their Deep Elemental Compositions

Did the terrestrial planets of the Solar System form by pebble accretion?

How the formation of Neptune shapes the Kuiper belt

Uranus and Neptune as methane planets: producing icy giants from refractory planetesimals

Dry or water world? How the water contents of inner sub-Neptunes constrain giant planet formation and the location of the water ice line

The formation of Jupiter by hybrid pebble-planetesimal accretion

From Dust to Planets I: Planetesimal and Embryo Formation

Extensive Pollution of Uranus and Neptune's Atmospheres by Upsweep of Icy Material During the Nice Model Migration

Can the giant planets of the Solar System form via pebble accretion in a smooth protoplanetary disc?

Migration then assembly: Formation of Neptune mass planets inside 1 AU

Formation of Venus, Earth and Mars: Constrained by isotopes

How planets form by pebble accretion V. Silicate rainout delays contraction of sub-Neptunes

Accretion of primordial H-He atmospheres in mini-Neptunes: The importance of envelope enrichment