Efficacy of liposomal irinotecan + 5-FU/LV vs. S-1 in gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer: a real-world study using inverse probability of treatment weighting

Hiroshi Imaoka,Masafumi Ikeda,Satoshi Kobayashi,Akihiro Ohba,Masayuki Ueno,Yuko Suzuki,Hidetaka Tsumura,Nana Kimura,Shinya Kawaguchi,Yasuyuki Kawamoto,Kohei Nakachi,Kunihiro Tsuji,Noritoshi Kobayashi,Reiko Ashida,Naohiro Okano,Kumiko Umemoto,Gou Murohisa,Ayumu Hosokawa,Akinori Asagi,Hiroko Nebiki,Rei Suzuki,Takeshi Terashima,Ryusuke Shibata,Kazuhito Kawata,Toshifumi Doi,Hiroshi Ohyama,Yohei Kitano,Kazuhiko Shioji,Hiroyuki Okuyama,Atsushi Naganuma,Yuji Negoro,Yasunari Sakamoto,Satoshi Shimizu,Chigusa Morizane,Makoto Ueno,Junji Furuse,Hiroaki Nagano,the Japan Oncology Network in Hepatobiliary and Pancreas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-024-02186-9
2024-12-03
Journal of Gastroenterology
Abstract:S-1 monotherapy had previously been widely used as a second-line treatment for pancreatic cancer (PC) after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy mainly in Japan. Based on the results of the NAPOLI-1 trial, the recommended second-line therapy is now liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/folinic acid (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV). However, there have been no studies comparing nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV therapy with S-1 monotherapy.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?