Abstract:Abstract To analyse climate change mitigation strategies, economists rely on simplified climate models—so-called climate emulators—that provide a realistic quantitative link between CO2 emissions and global warming at low computational costs. In this paper, we propose a generic and transparent calibration and evaluation strategy for these climate emulators that are based on freely and easily accessible state-of-the-art benchmark data from climate sciences. We demonstrate that the appropriate choice of the free model parameters can be of key relevance for the predicted social cost of carbon. The key idea we put forward is to calibrate the simplified climate models to benchmark data from comprehensive global climate models that took part in the coupled model intercomparison project, phase 5 (CMIP5). In particular, we propose to use four different test cases that are considered pivotal in the climate science literature: two highly idealized tests to separately calibrate and evaluate the carbon cycle and temperature response, an idealized test to quantify the transient climate response, and a final test to evaluate the performance for scenarios close to those arising from economic models, and that include exogenous forcing. As a concrete example, we re-calibrate the climate part of the widely used DICE-2016, fathoming the CMIP5 uncertainty range of model responses: the multi-model mean as well as extreme, but still permissible climate sensitivities and carbon cycle responses. We demonstrate that the functional form of the climate emulator of the DICE-2016 model is fit for purpose, despite its simplicity, but its carbon cycle and temperature equations are miscalibrated, leading to the conclusion that one may want to be skeptical about predictions derived from DICE-2016. We examine the importance of the calibration for the social cost of carbon in the context of a partial equilibrium setting where interest rates are exogenous, as well as the simple general equilibrium setting from DICE-2016. We find that the model uncertainty from different consistent calibrations of the climate system can change the social cost of carbon by a factor of 4 if one assumes a quadratic damage function. When calibrated to the multi-model mean, our model predicts similar values for the social cost of carbon as the original DICE-2016, but with a strongly reduced sensitivity to the discount rate and about 1 degree less long-term warming. The social cost of carbon in DICE-2016 is oversensitive to the discount rate, leading to extreme comparative statics responses to changes in preferences.

Intergenerational Equity in Models of Climate Change Mitigation: Stochastic Interest Rates introduce Adverse Effects, but (Non-linear) Funding Costs can Improve Intergenerational Equity

Intergenerational Equitable Climate Change Mitigation: Negative Effects of Stochastic Interest Rates; Positive Effects of Financing

Discounting the Future: On Climate Change, Ambiguity Aversion and Epstein–Zin Preferences

Modeling myths: On DICE and dynamic realism in integrated assessment models of climate change mitigation

Climate uncertainty, financial frictions and constrained efficient carbon taxation

Endogenous preference for non-market goods in carbon abatement decision

Temporal and Spatial Distribution of Global Mitigation Cost: INDCs and Equity

Statistical analysis and stochastic interest rate modelling for valuing the future with implications in climate change mitigation

The Climate in Climate Economics

Climate uncertainty impacts on optimal mitigation pathways and social cost of carbon

Climate Threshold, Financial Hoarding and Economic Growth

Economics of carbon-dioxide abatement under an exogenous constraint on cumulative emissions

Declining CO2 price paths

Progress, Curse, or Mixed Blessing: the Impacts of Multiple Climate Ambiguities on the Optimal Carbon Emission Abatement Policy

Optimal Climate Policy As If the Transition Matters

Climate policy design, competitiveness and income distribution: A macro-micro assessment for 11 EU countries

A multi-model assessment of inequality and climate change

Derisking the low-carbon transition: investors’ reaction to climate policies, decarbonization and distributive effects

Least-cost and 2 °C-Compliant Mitigation Pathways Robust to Physical Uncertainty, Economic Paradigms, and Intergenerational Cost Distribution

Complexity, economic science and possible economic benefits of climate change mitigation policy

Will the Use of a Carbon Tax for Revenue Generation Produce an Incentive to Continue Carbon Emissions