Abstract:Deeper insights on internal model behaviors are essential as hydrological models are becoming more and more complex. Our study provides a framework which combines the time-varying global sensitivity analyses with data mining techniques to unravel the process-level behavior of high-complexity models and tease out the main information. The extracted information is further used to assist parameter identification. The physically-based Distributed Hydrology-Soil-Vegetation Model (DHSVM) set up in a mountainous watershed is used as a case study. Specifically, a two-step GSA including time-aggregated and time-variant approaches are conducted to address the problem of high parameter dimensionality and characterize the time-varying parameter importance. As we found difficulties in interpreting the long-term complicated dynamics, a clustering operation is performed to partition the entire period into several clusters and extract the corresponding temporal parameter importance patterns. Finally, the clustered time clusters are utilized in parameterization, where each parameter is identified in their dominant times. Results are summarized as follows: (1) importance of selected soil and vegetation parameters varies greatly throughout the period; (2) typical patterns of parameter importance corresponding to flood, very short dry-to-wet, fast recession and continuous dry periods are successfully distinguished. We argue that somewhere between “total period” and “continuous discrete time” can be more useful for understanding and interpretation; (3) parameters dominant for short times are much more identifiable when they are identified in dominance time cluster(s); (4) the enhanced parameter identifiability overall improves the model performance according to the metrics of NSE, LNSE, and RMSE, suggesting that the use of GSA information has the potential to provide a better search for optimal parameter sets.

Navigating the Noise: Bringing Clarity to ML Parameterization Design with O(100) Ensembles

Investigating Dynamic Parameter Importance of a High-Complexity Hydrological Model and Implications for Parameterization

Stable Machine-Learning Parameterization of Subgrid Processes with Real Geography and Full-physics Emulation

Online Learning of Entrainment Closures in a Hybrid Machine Learning Parameterization

Uncertainty Quantification of a Machine Learning Subgrid‐Scale Parameterization for Atmospheric Gravity Waves

Neural Network Parameterization of Subgrid‐Scale Physics From a Realistic Geography Global Storm‐Resolving Simulation

Simulating Atmospheric Processes in Earth System Models and Quantifying Uncertainties with Deep Learning Multi-Member and Stochastic Parameterizations

Interpretable multiscale Machine Learning-Based Parameterizations of Convection for ICON

Stress-testing the coupled behavior of hybrid physics-machine learning climate simulations on an unseen, warmer climate

Interpreting and Stabilizing Machine-learning Parametrizations of Convection

Implementation and Evaluation of a Machine Learned Mesoscale Eddy Parameterization into a Numerical Ocean Circulation Model

Reliable coarse-grained turbulent simulations through combined offline learning and neural emulation

Using Deep Learning to Improve Ensemble Smoother: Applications to Subsurface Characterization

An Analysis of Deep Learning Parameterizations for Ocean Subgrid Eddy Forcing

Stable machine-learning parameterization of subgrid processes for climate modeling at a range of resolutions

Using machine learning to parameterize moist convection: potential for modeling of climate, climate change and extreme events

Machine learning accelerates parameter optimization and uncertainty assessment of a land surface model

Non‐local parameterization of atmospheric subgrid processes with neural networks

Combining data assimilation and machine learning to infer unresolved scale parametrisation

Coupled online learning as a way to tackle instabilities and biases in neural network parameterizations

Training physics‐based machine‐learning parameterizations with gradient‐free ensemble Kalman methods