The strain on scientific publishing

Mark A. Hanson,Pablo Gómez Barreiro,Paolo Crosetto,Dan Brockington

2024-07-15

Abstract:Scientists are increasingly overwhelmed by the volume of articles being published. Total articles indexed in Scopus and Web of Science have grown exponentially in recent years; in 2022 the article total was approximately ~47% higher than in 2016, which has outpaced the limited growth - if any - in the number of practising scientists. Thus, publication workload per scientist (writing, reviewing, editing) has increased dramatically. We define this problem as the strain on scientific publishing. To analyse this strain, we present five data-driven metrics showing publisher growth, processing times, and citation behaviours. We draw these data from web scrapes, requests for data from publishers, and material that is freely available through publisher websites. Our findings are based on millions of papers produced by leading academic publishers. We find specific groups have disproportionately grown in their articles published per year, contributing to this strain. Some publishers enabled this growth by adopting a strategy of hosting special issues, which publish articles with reduced turnaround times. Given pressures on researchers to publish or perish to be competitive for funding applications, this strain was likely amplified by these offers to publish more articles. We also observed widespread year-over-year inflation of journal impact factors coinciding with this strain, which risks confusing quality signals. Such exponential growth cannot be sustained. The metrics we define here should enable this evolving conversation to reach actionable solutions to address the strain on scientific publishing.

Digital Libraries

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores a significant issue in the field of scientific publishing—the strain on scientific publishing, specifically manifested in the following aspects:

1. **Background of the Problem**: In recent years, the number of academic papers has grown exponentially, while the number of scientists has increased relatively limitedly. This has led to a substantial increase in the number of papers each scientist needs to handle, including writing, reviewing, and editing work.

2. **Core Problem Definition**: The authors define this issue as "the strain on scientific publishing" and propose 5 data-driven indicators to analyze this phenomenon. These indicators include the growth of publishers, changes in processing time, and citation behavior, among others.

3. **Analysis Methods**: The researchers collected a large amount of data, including the total number of articles indexed by Scopus and Web of Science, the proportion of special issues, the time from submission to acceptance of articles, journal rejection rates, and a new citation behavior-based indicator—"impact factor inflation."

4. **Key Findings**:
- Certain publishers increase the number of articles by publishing a large number of "special issues," which typically allow for shorter turnaround times.
- Some publishers have increased the number of published articles through this method, exacerbating the strain on scientific publishing.
- Certain publishers under the open access model are more inclined to adopt this approach compared to other types of publishers.

5. **Conclusions and Recommendations**: The authors believe that this exponential growth is unsustainable and propose specific transparency requirements and actions that publishers, researchers, and funding agencies can take to alleviate the strain on scientific publishing.

In summary, the paper aims to reveal the issues present in the current scientific publishing system and propose solutions to address the challenges posed by the continuously growing number of scientific publications.