PrivCPM: Privacy-Preserving Cooperative Pricing Mechanism in Coupled Power-Traffic Networks
Quan Yuan,Mingyang Sun,Yujie Sheng,Qinglai Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2024.3406572
IF: 10.275
2024-01-01
IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
Abstract:The growing development of the fast charging of electric vehicles has strengthened the interdependence between urban transportation networks (UTN) and power distribution networks (PDN). Through cooperative price guidance of UTN operator and PDN operator, the performance of the above networks can be improved coordinately. However, vehicle travelers may not want to share their actual traveling and charging demand information with the UTN and PDN operators for pricing due to privacy concerns. In order to protect travelers privacy while reducing the system operation cost, this paper proposes a privacy-preserving cooperative pricing framework PrivCPM for the power-traffic networks. In particular, a novel privacy preservation mechanism, DPTC, based on the Differential Privacy technique for Traffic and Charging demands is designed with a physics-constrained post-processing (PP) process, which is developed to enhance the utility of the perturbed data significantly (i.e., improve the feasibility of the cooperative pricing optimization problem and reduce the system operation costs) by integrating the actual network constraints and the correlation between various types of vehicles. Comprehensive case studies are conducted based on a 12-node UTN and a 20-node PDN. The results show that, compared to the operation cost obtained using the true data, PrivCPM under the privacy budget (i.e., the upper limit of the amount of information that can be disclosed) of 0.01 can obtain the near-optimal solution with only approximately 2.6% higher cost. Moreover, the proposed PP process can significantly enlarge the range of travelers privacy budget, and the operation cost obtained by using PrivCPM can achieve a 3.35% cost reduction but with a five times lower privacy budget compared to the conventional method (i.e., PrivCPM without PP). In addition, PrivCPM in the above setting merely increased the cost by 7.31% compared to the non-private case.