Techno-Economic Analysis of Synthetic Fuel Production from Existing Nuclear Power Plants across the United States

Marisol Garrouste,Michael T. Craig,Daniel Wendt,Maria Herrera Diaz,William Jenson,Qian Zhang,Brendan Kochunas
2023-09-21
Abstract:Low carbon synfuel can displace transport fossil fuels such as diesel and jet fuel and help achieve the decarbonization of the transportation sector at a global scale, but large-scale cost-effective production facilities are needed. Meanwhile, nuclear power plants are closing due to economic difficulties: electricity prices are too low and variable to cover their operational costs. Using existing nuclear power plants to produce synfuels might prevent loss of these low-carbon assets while producing synfuels at scale, but no technoeconomic analysis of this Integrated Energy System exist. We quantify the technoeconomic potential of coupling a synthetic fuel production process with five example nuclear power plants across the U.S. to explore the influence of different electricity markets, access to carbon dioxide sources, and fuel markets. Coupling synfuel production increases nuclear plant profitability by up to 792 million USD(2020) in addition to a 10 percent rate of return on investment over a 20 year period. Our analysis identifies drivers for the economic profitability of the synfuel IES. The hydrogen production tax credit from the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act is essential to its overall profitability representing on average three quarters of its revenues. The carbon feedstock transportation is the highest cost - more than a third on average - closely followed by the synfuel production process capital costs. Those results show the key role of incentive policies for the decarbonization of the transportation sector and the economic importance of the geographic location of Integrated Energy Systems.
General Economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to address the economic and technical issues in the production of synthetic fuels, particularly in the context of large-scale, low-cost production using existing nuclear power plants. Specifically: 1. **Alternative to Fossil Fuels**: Low-carbon synthetic fuels can replace diesel and aviation fuel in the transportation sector, contributing to the decarbonization of global transportation. However, this requires the construction of large and cost-effective production facilities. 2. **Economic Benefits of Nuclear Power Plants**: Many nuclear power plants in the United States are facing economic difficulties and are shutting down due to low and volatile electricity prices. By integrating synthetic fuel production with existing nuclear power plants, the loss of these low-carbon assets can be avoided, and large-scale synthetic fuel production can be achieved. 3. **Lack of Techno-Economic Analysis**: There is currently a lack of techno-economic analysis for such integrated energy systems (IES). Therefore, the paper analyzes five nuclear power plants located in different regions of the United States to explore the economic impact of different electricity markets, carbon dioxide sources, and fuel markets on this system. 4. **Role of Policy Incentives**: The study finds that policy incentives are crucial for the decarbonization of the transportation sector, and geographic location significantly affects the economic benefits of integrated energy systems. In particular, the hydrogen production tax credit in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act is critical to the overall profitability of this system. In summary, the main objective of the paper is to assess the economic feasibility of integrated energy systems combining synthetic fuels and nuclear power, and to identify the key drivers of profitability.