Salman Habib,Robert Roser,Richard Gerber,Katie Antypas,Katherine Riley,Tim Williams,Jack Wells,Tjerk Straatsma,A. Almgren,J. Amundson,S. Bailey,D. Bard,K. Bloom,B. Bockelman,A. Borgland,J. Borrill,R. Boughezal,R. Brower,B. Cowan,H. Finkel,N. Frontiere,S. Fuess,L. Ge,N. Gnedin,S. Gottlieb,O. Gutsche,T. Han,K. Heitmann,S. Hoeche,K. Ko,O. Kononenko,T. LeCompte,Z. Li,Z. Lukic,W. Mori,P. Nugent,C.-K. Ng,G. Oleynik,B. O'Shea,N. Padmanabhan,D. Petravick,F.J. Petriello,J. Power,J. Qiang,L. Reina,T.J. Rizzo,R. Ryne,M. Schram,P. Spentzouris,D. Toussaint,J.-L. Vay,B. Viren,F. Wurthwein,L. Xiao

Abstract:This draft report summarizes and details the findings, results, and recommendations derived from the ASCR/HEP Exascale Requirements Review meeting held in June, 2015. The main conclusions are as follows. 1) Larger, more capable computing and data facilities are needed to support HEP science goals in all three frontiers: Energy, Intensity, and Cosmic. The expected scale of the demand at the 2025 timescale is at least two orders of magnitude -- and in some cases greater -- than that available currently. 2) The growth rate of data produced by simulations is overwhelming the current ability, of both facilities and researchers, to store and analyze it. Additional resources and new techniques for data analysis are urgently needed. 3) Data rates and volumes from HEP experimental facilities are also straining the ability to store and analyze large and complex data volumes. Appropriately configured leadership-class facilities can play a transformational role in enabling scientific discovery from these datasets. 4) A close integration of HPC simulation and data analysis will aid greatly in interpreting results from HEP experiments. Such an integration will minimize data movement and facilitate interdependent workflows. 5) Long-range planning between HEP and ASCR will be required to meet HEP's research needs. To best use ASCR HPC resources the experimental HEP program needs a) an established long-term plan for access to ASCR computational and data resources, b) an ability to map workflows onto HPC resources, c) the ability for ASCR facilities to accommodate workflows run by collaborations that can have thousands of individual members, d) to transition codes to the next-generation HPC platforms that will be available at ASCR facilities, e) to build up and train a workforce capable of developing and using simulations and analysis to support HEP scientific research on next-generation systems.

Constructing the Hyper-Kamiokande Computing Model in the Build Up to Data Taking

Hyper-Kamiokande construction status and prospects

Triggering and data acquisition for the Hyper-Kamiokande experiment

Future of computing at the Large Hadron Collider

Computing for the DUNE Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment

Modeling Distributed Computing Infrastructures for HEP Applications

US ATLAS and US CMS HPC and Cloud Blueprint

High-Throughput Computing on High-Performance Platforms: A Case Study

Modeling Performance of Data Collection Systems for High-Energy Physics

Prototyping a ROOT-based distributed analysis workflow for HL-LHC: the CMS use case

Big Data in HEP: A comprehensive use case study

Can Clouds replace Grids? Will Clouds replace Grids?

HACC: Simulating Sky Surveys on State-of-the-Art Supercomputing Architectures

HEPCloud, a New Paradigm for HEP Facilities: CMS Amazon Web Services Investigation

The XENON1T Data Distribution and Processing Scheme

Building A High Performance Parallel File System Using Grid Datafarm and ROOT I/O

Using Big Data Technologies for HEP Analysis

HPC resources for CMS offline computing: An integration and scalability challenge for the Submission Infrastructure

Toward real-time data query systems in HEP

HEP computing collaborations for the challenges of the next decade

ASCR/HEP Exascale Requirements Review Report