Abstract:Rapid increase of seismic data poses challenges to seismic data processing, in which phase-picking is a crucial procedure and accordingly attracts attention from seismologists. Among the breakthroughs in deep learning methods for seismic data processing, seismologists have especially proposed many seismic phase-picking methods based on deep learning, which have shown much better accuracy than traditional automatic phase-picking methods. However, further improvements are needed to meet the requirements for processing continuous seismic records. Here we propose a new approach combining seismic array scheme and U-Net, an end-to-end neural network developed in image segmentation. Previous studies have shown that U-Net can classify waveforms and determine the onset of seismic phases accurately with the help of contracting and expanding paths. Based on U-Net, we first design a deep learning phase picker (PP) model with a long (40 s) time window. To avoid difficulties in time window selection and interference between P- and S-phase identifications, the model involves two networks with the same structure, which pick the P and S phases separately. To improve model training, we employ data transformation to expand the sample set, add typical noises to the sample set for better resemblance of real data, and slightly increase the weight of the seismic signal containing seismic records for a better balance between precision and recall. We also adopt a more effective array-assisted phase picker (APP) model which correlates the picking results from different stations to minimize misidentification. Using data from Hi-net and Alibaba Aftershock AI Capture Contest, we design training and test sets of different sizes to examine the performance and generalization ability of the model. Results show that the APP can effectively pick the body-wave phases on continuous records with a good generalization ability. The relationship between the model performance and training set is such that the model performance is directly related to the data quality rather than the size of the training set, and there is no serious overfitting even for a small training set. Statistics further show that the model has no special requirements for the locations of time windows and can handle seismic records with large epicentral distances. By comparison with other models (model with short time windows or the one of simultaneous picking of P- and S-phases), we find that APP can successfully process event-crowded waveform data and effectively reduce the influence of noise. Finally, we apply the trained model to a seismic network in the Inner Mongolia. Results show that the number of earthquakes detected by the APP is 30 times the manually-detected one, and that 98.1% of the events in the catalog are detected by the APP. The successful application to a seismic network different from the training set suggests that the APP is robust and has strong generalization ability.

Deep generative model conditioned by phase picks for synthesizing labeled seismic waveforms with limited data

Domain Adaptation in Automatic Picking of Phase Velocity Dispersions Based on Deep Learning

SeismoGen: Seismic Waveform Synthesis Using GAN with Application to Seismic Data Augmentation

SeismoGen: Seismic Waveform Synthesis Using Generative Adversarial Networks

Seismic arrival-time picking on distributed acoustic sensing data using semi-supervised learning

An Array-Assisted Deep Learning Approach to Seismic Phase-Picking

Seismic-phase detection using multiple deep learning models for global and local representations of waveforms

Phase arrival picking for bridging multi-source downhole microseismic data using deep transfer learning

Phase Neural Operator for Multi-Station Picking of Seismic Arrivals

EdgePhase: A Deep Learning Model for Multi‐station Seismic Phase Picking

Seis-PnSn: A Global Million-Scale Benchmark Data Set of Pn and Sn Seismic Phases for Deep Learning

Deep‐Learning‐Based Phase Picking for Volcano‐Tectonic and Long‐Period Earthquakes

Semi-Supervised Deep Learning Seismic Impedance Inversion Using Generative Adversarial Networks

Simulating Multicomponent Elastic Seismic Wavefield Using Deep Learning

Using a Deep Neural Network and Transfer Learning to Bridge Scales for Seismic Phase Picking

High Resolution Seismic Waveform Generation using Denoising Diffusion

Physics-driven cycle network for seismic impedance inversion using conditional generative adversarial networks

A Lightweight Network for Seismic Phase Picking on Embedded Systems

Augmenting Seismic Data Using Generative Adversarial Network for Low-Cost MEMS Sensors

Deep Learning-based Small Magnitude Earthquake Detection and Seismic Phase Classification

Seismic Foundation Model (SFM): a new generation deep learning model in geophysics