Abstract:Pseudorandom quantum states (PRSs) and pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) possess the dual nature of being efficiently constructible while appearing completely random to any efficient quantum algorithm. In this study, we establish fundamental bounds on pseudorandomness. We show that PRSs and PRUs exist only when the probability that an error occurs is negligible, ruling out their generation on noisy intermediate-scale and early fault-tolerant quantum computers. Further, we show that PRUs need imaginarity while PRS do not have this restriction. This implies that quantum randomness requires in general a complex-valued formalism of quantum mechanics, while for random quantum states real numbers suffice. Additionally, we derive lower bounds on the coherence of PRSs and PRUs, ruling out the existence of sparse PRUs and PRSs. We also show that the notions of PRS, PRUs and pseudorandom scramblers (PRSSs) are distinct in terms of resource requirements. We introduce the concept of pseudoresources, where states which contain a low amount of a given resource masquerade as high-resource states. We define pseudocoherence, pseudopurity and pseudoimaginarity, and identify three distinct types of pseudoresources in terms of their masquerading capabilities. Our work also establishes rigorous bounds on the efficiency of property testing, demonstrating the exponential complexity in distinguishing real quantum states from imaginary ones, in contrast to the efficient measurability of unitary imaginarity. Lastly, we show that the transformation from a complex to a real model of quantum computation is inefficient, in contrast to the reverse process, which is efficient. Our results establish fundamental limits on property testing and provide valuable insights into quantum pseudorandomness.

Indistinguishability between quantum randomness and pseudo-randomness under efficiently calculable randomness measures

Pseudorandom unitaries are neither real nor sparse nor noise-robust

Does True Randomness Exist? Efficacy Testing IBM Quantum Computers via Statistical Randomness

Certified Randomness from Untrusted Sources and Uncharacterized Measurements.

Random numbers certified by Bell’s theorem

Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Randomness Certification from Incompatibility

Estimating distinguishability measures on quantum computers

Traceable random numbers from a nonlocal quantum advantage

The algorithmic randomness of quantum measurements

Experimental Certification of Random Numbers Via Quantum Contextuality.

QMA vs. QCMA and Pseudorandomness

Exploring Quantum Contextuality to Generate True Random Numbers

Experimental certification of more than one bit of quantum randomness in the two inputs and two outputs scenario

Pseudorandomness in the (Inverseless) Haar Random Oracle Model

How to Construct Random Unitaries

Pseudomagic Quantum States

Quantum Pseudorandomness Cannot Be Shrunk In a Black-Box Way

Maximum Quantum Non-Locality is not always Sufficient for Device-Independent Randomness Generation

More Randomness from a Prepare-and-measure Scenario with Independent Devices

Intrinsic Randomness under General Quantum Measurements