Abstract:Adiabatic evolution is an emergent design principle for time modulated metamaterials, often inspired by insights from topological quantum computing such as braiding operations. However, the pursuit of classical adiabatic metamaterials is rooted in the assumption that classical and quantum adiabatic evolution are equivalent. We show that this is only true in the limit where the frequencies of all the bands are at infinite distance from $0$; and some instances of quantum adiabatic evolution, such as those containing zero modes, cannot be reproduced in classical systems. This is because mode coupling is fundamentally different in classical mechanics. We derive classical conditions to ensure adiabaticity and demonstrate that only under these conditions - which are different from quantum adiabatic conditions -, the single band Berry phase and Wilczek-Zee matrix for everywhere degenerate bands emerge as meaningful quantities encoding the geometry of classical adiabatic evolution. Finally, for general multiband systems we uncover a correction term in the non-Abelian gauge potential for classical systems.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problems does this paper attempt to solve?
This paper aims to explore and compare the differences between quantum adiabatic evolution and classical adiabatic evolution. Specifically, the authors focus on the following points:
1. **Challenges to assumptions**:
- Many studies assume that classical adiabatic evolution and quantum adiabatic evolution are equivalent, especially in terms of the frequency - spacing condition. However, this paper points out that this assumption is generally not valid.
2. **Differences in mode coupling**:
- Since time - dependent classical systems are mapped to non - Hermitian quantum systems, differences in the mode - coupling equations result. This introduces an additional condition to ensure the adiabaticity of the classical system and reveals a correction term for the non - Abelian gauge potential in the classical system.
3. **Differences in geometric quantities**:
- In the classical system, the single - band Berry phase and the Wilczek - Zee matrix are only meaningful under specific conditions, which are different from the quantum conditions.
4. **Equivalence in limit cases**:
- The study also finds that in the limit case where all frequency bands are far from zero frequency, classical adiabatic evolution can approximate quantum adiabatic evolution.
5. **Energy consumption**:
- The problem of energy consumption in classical adiabatic evolution is analyzed, and it is pointed out that due to non - conservation of the norm, its energy consumption is non - trivial.
6. **Multiband systems**:
- The above conclusions are generalized to multiband systems, and the correction term for the non - Abelian gauge potential in the classical system is derived, which may provide new ideas for designing new time - modulated metamaterials.
Through these analyses, the paper reveals important differences between classical and quantum adiabatic evolution and provides a theoretical basis for understanding the relationship between the two. In addition, the authors also point out the cases where the two can tend to be consistent under certain limit conditions.
### Key formulas
- **Dynamic phase and geometric phase**:
\[
\Lambda_n(t)=\int_0^t dt' \lambda_n(t')
\]
\[
\gamma_n(t)=\int_0^t dt' \langle n(t')|\dot{n}(t')\rangle
\]
- **Classical adiabatic approximation**:
\[
|\psi_c^{\text{adia}}(t)\rangle\approx\sqrt{\frac{\omega_n(0)}{\omega_n(t)}}\cos(\Omega_n(t))|n(t)\rangle
\]
- **Classical adiabatic condition**:
\[
\max_{t\in[0, T_f]}\left|\frac{\langle n|\dot{m}\rangle}{\omega_{mn}(t)}\sqrt{\frac{\omega_m(0)}{\omega_n(0)}}\sqrt{\frac{\omega_n(t)}{\omega_m(t)}+\frac{\omega_m(t)}{\omega_n(t)}}\right|\ll1
\]
\[
\max_{t\in[0, T_f]}\left|\frac{\dot{\omega}_n(t)}{4\omega_n^2(t)}\right|\ll1
\]
These formulas show the mathematical differences between classical and quantum adiabatic evolution and the conditions for ensuring the adiabaticity of the classical system.