Abstract:The Warsaw Loss and Damage Mechanism holds high appeal for complementing actions on climate change adaptation and mitigation, and for delivering needed support for tackling intolerable climate related-risks that will neither be addressed by mitigation nor by adaptation. Yet, negotiations under the UNFCCC are caught between demands for climate justice, understood as compensation, for increases in extreme and slow-onset event risk, and the reluctance of other parties to consider Loss and Damage outside of an adaptation framework. Working towards a jointly acceptable position we suggest an actionable way forward for the deliberations may be based on aligning comprehensive climate risk analytics with distributive and compensatory justice considerations. Our proposed framework involves in a short-medium term, needs-based perspective support for climate risk management beyond countries ability to absorb risk. In a medium-longer term, liability-based perspective we particularly suggest to consider liabilities attributable to anthropogenic climate change and associated impacts. We develop the framework based on principles of need and liability, and identify the policy space for Loss and Damage as composed of curative and transformative measures. Transformative measures, such as managed retreat, have already received attention in discussions on comprehensive climate risk management. Curative action is less clearly defined, and more contested. Among others, support for a climate displacement facility could qualify here. For both sets of measures, risk financing (such as ‘climate insurance’) emerges as an entry point for further policy action, as it holds potential for both risk management as well as compensation functions. To quantify the Loss and Damage space for specific countries, we suggest as one option to build on a risk layering approach that segments risk and risk interventions according to risk tolerance. An application to fiscal risks in Bangladesh and at the global scale provides an estimate of countries’ financial support needs for dealing with intolerable layers of flood risk. With many aspects of Loss and Damage being of immaterial nature, we finally suggest that our broad risk and justice approach in principle can also see application to issues such as migration and preservation of cultural heritage.

Lost options commitment: how short-term policies affect long-term scope of action

What Role for Short-Lived Climate Pollutants in Mitigation Policy?

Reducing Uncertainties of Future Global Soil Carbon Responses to Climate and Land Use Change with Emergent Constraints

Feasible climate mitigation

Uncompensated claims to fair emission space risk putting Paris Agreement goals out of reach

Pathways Versus Incentives: Climate Activism to Climate Aligned Portfolio Management

Overconfidence in climate overshoot

A climate policy pathway for near- and long-term benefits

Long-term climate implications of twenty-first century options for carbon dioxide emission mitigation

Points of No Return to Respect the Paris Agreement

Improving International Climate Policy via Mutually Conditional Binding Commitments

Is There an Optimal Timing for Sequestration to Stabilize Future Climate?

Protect, manage and then restore lands for climate mitigation

A Climate Stress-Test of the Financial System

Allocation of global temperature change to consumers

Climate policy and the SDGs agenda: How does near-term action on nexus SDGs influence the achievement of long-term climate goals?

Fast action on short-lived climate pollutants and nature-based solutions to help countries meet carbon neutrality goals

The Risk and Policy Space for Loss and Damage: Integrating Notions of Distributive and Compensatory Justice with Comprehensive Climate Risk Management

Optimal Climate Strategy with Mitigation, Carbon Removal, and Solar Geoengineering

Least-cost and 2 °C-Compliant Mitigation Pathways Robust to Physical Uncertainty, Economic Paradigms, and Intergenerational Cost Distribution

Black Carbon and Other Short-Lived Climate Pollutants (SLCPs): How SLCPs are Altering Our Understanding of the Global Climate System - And How This Will Require the Abandonment of the Standard Climate Metric CO2e