Government Investments and Entrepreneurship

Joao Ricardo Faria,Laudo Ogura,Mauricio Prado,Christopher J. Boudreaux
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00743-9
2023-09-13
Abstract:How can governments attract entrepreneurs and their businesses? The view that new business creation grows with the optimal level of government investments remains appealing to policymakers. In contrast with this active approach, we build a model where governments may adopt a passive approach to stimulating business creation. The insights from this model suggest new business creation depends positively on factors beyond government investments--attracting high-skilled migrants to the region and lower property prices, taxes, and fines on firms in the informal sector. These findings suggest whether entrepreneurs generate business creation in the region does not only depend on government investments. It also depends on location and skilled migration. Our model also provides methodological implications--the relationship between government investments and new business creation is endogenously determined, so unless adjustments are made, econometric estimates will be biased and inconsistent. We conclude with policy and managerial implications.
General Economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of how governments can attract entrepreneurs and their businesses. Specifically, the author explores two methods of government support for entrepreneurship: active methods (such as government actively investing in infrastructure) and passive methods (such as creating a favorable environment by lowering property prices, taxes, and fines). The paper analyzes the effectiveness of these methods by constructing a model and points out that the creation of new businesses depends not only on government investment but also on factors such as geographical location and high-skilled immigration. Additionally, the paper emphasizes that the relationship between government investment and the creation of new businesses is endogenously determined, and without proper adjustments, econometric estimates will be biased and inconsistent. ### Main Issues: 1. **How can governments attract entrepreneurs and their businesses?** 2. **What is the relationship between government investment and the creation of new businesses?** 3. **How significant is the impact of geographical location and high-skilled immigration on the creation of new businesses?** ### Main Contributions of the Paper: 1. **Extends the existing models of government investment and entrepreneurship** by considering the diversity and heterogeneity of government support policies. 2. **Uses advanced methods to study multidisciplinary entrepreneurship literature**, providing a more comprehensive theoretical framework. 3. **Reveals the endogenous relationship between government investment and the creation of new businesses**, highlighting potential biases in econometric estimates. 4. **Provides important recommendations for public policy**, particularly regarding the role of government in promoting entrepreneurship. ### Conclusion: Governments can create an environment conducive to business creation by lowering property prices, taxes, and fines, and by encouraging high-skilled immigration. This is more effective than solely relying on government investment. The paper also emphasizes that policymakers should focus on local policies rather than targeting specific businesses.