Maintaining human wellbeing as socio-environmental systems undergo regime shifts

Andrew R. Tilman,Elisabeth H. Krueger,Lisa C. McManus,James R. Watson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108194

2023-09-09

Abstract:Global environmental change is pushing many socio-environmental systems towards critical thresholds, where ecological systems' states are on the precipice of tipping points and interventions are needed to navigate or avert impending transitions. Flickering, where a system vacillates between alternative stable states, is touted as a useful early warning signal of irreversible transitions to undesirable ecological regimes. However, while flickering may presage an ecological tipping point, these dynamics also pose unique challenges for human adaptation. In this work, we link an ecological model that can exhibit flickering to a model of human adaptation to a changing environment. This allows us to explore the impact of flickering on the utility of adaptive agents in a coupled socio-environmental system. We highlight the conditions under which flickering causes wellbeing to decline disproportionately, and explore how these dynamics impact the optimal timing of a transformational change that partially decouples wellbeing from environmental variability. The implications of flickering on nomadic communities in Mongolia, artisanal fisheries, and wildfire systems are explored as possible case studies. Flickering, driven in part by climate change and changes to governance systems, may already be impacting communities. We argue that governance interventions investing in adaptive capacity could blunt the negative impact of flickering that can occur as socio-environmental systems pass through tipping points, and therefore contribute to the sustainability of these systems.

Theoretical Economics,Physics and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the issue of how to maintain human well-being when socio-environmental systems undergo critical transitions. Specifically, the study focuses on how humans adapt to these changes to maintain their quality of life as ecosystems approach or cross critical thresholds.

### Background
Global environmental changes are driving many socio-environmental systems towards critical thresholds, where the state of these systems may be on the verge of irreversible changes. This transition, known as a "critical transition," requires interventions to avoid or cope with the impending shift. Among these, the phenomenon of "flickering" is considered a useful early warning signal, where the system rapidly switches between different stable states. However, while "flickering" can indicate the approach of ecological critical points, these dynamics also pose unique challenges for human adaptation.

### Research Objectives
This paper explores the impact of "flickering" on the utility of adaptive agents by combining an ecological model that exhibits "flickering" with a model describing human adaptation to changing environments. The research focuses on:
1. **Impact of "flickering" on human well-being**: Specifically, under what conditions "flickering" leads to a disproportionate decline in well-being.
2. **Optimal timing for transformative changes**: Investigating when to implement partially decoupled transformative changes to maintain well-being during critical transitions in socio-environmental systems.

### Case Studies
The paper examines the impact of "flickering" on Mongolian nomadic communities, artisanal fisheries, and wildfire systems as potential case studies. These cases illustrate that climate change and changes in governance systems have already affected these communities.

### Methods
1. **Ecological Model**: Assume an ecological state \( x \), whose dynamics are described by logistic growth and a type 3 functional response capture rate \( c \). This model can exhibit multistability and "flickering" phenomena.
2. **Human Adaptation Model**: Assume individuals can adapt to environmental changes by adjusting their production strategies, but this process is limited by adaptive capacity \( l \). In the model, the utility function \( U(x, y) \) of individuals depends on the difference between the current environmental state \( x \) and the state \( y \) to which the individual is best adapted.

### Results
1. **Three Environmental Dynamic Modes**:
- **Mode 1**: Stable equilibrium with high resource biomass.
- **Mode 2**: Multistability, including high biomass and degraded environmental states.
- **Mode 3**: Stable equilibrium with only degraded environmental states.
2. **Adaptation and Well-being**:
- In Mode 1, environmental dynamics change significantly, but adaptation generally falls within the range of environmental variation.
- In Mode 2, the system switches between different equilibrium regions, leading to significant mismatches between adaptation and environmental states over long periods, negatively impacting individual utility (well-being).
- In Mode 3, although the environment has collapsed, individuals with limited adaptive capacity can eventually adapt to the permanently degraded environmental state, thereby improving average utility.

### Conclusion
The phenomenon of "flickering" poses unique challenges to individuals with limited adaptive capacity in socio-environmental systems, potentially leading to a decline in well-being. The study suggests that investing in enhancing adaptive capacity can mitigate the negative impacts of "flickering," thereby contributing to the sustainability of the system.