Abstract:In our paper [1], we studied the magnetic response of H$_3$S and LaH$_{10}$ superconductors to an applied magnetic field using Superconducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID) magnetometry. Hirsch, in his comment [2], highlighted an inconsistency in the data averaging procedure while questioning whether high-Tc hydrides are superconductors at all. We accept the criticism regarding our method of extracting the penetration field HP from the original data. Our SQUID magnet becomes noisy at high magnetic fields, which necessitated the smoothing of a small portion of the data. To eliminate any data processing issues, we have performed an alternative data analysis that does not require data smoothing to estimate the penetration field Hp values. The formulation of the analysis is identical to the one widely used for determining critical currents in superconductors3. Recently, it has been shown to work effectively for extracting Hp and the lower critical field Hc1 from DC magnetization data4. The Hp values of the present analysis are consistent with those published in our original work1. We wish to emphasize very clearly that the criticism pertains to the secondary issue of determining Ginzburg-Landau parameters for these hydride superconductors and does not undermine the validity of the existence of hydride superconductivity. Indeed, as part of our paper1, we also published m(H) curves demonstrating the virgin curve (about which the analysis issues were raised) followed by magnetic hysteretic loops that have the classic form of the hysteresis curves of superconductors. Above Tc, in both H$_3$S and LaH$_{10}$, the hysteresis is absent. We make all the data available so that readers can judge for themselves.

On magnetic field screening and trapping in hydrogen-rich high-temperature superconductors: unpulling the wool over readers' eyes

On the interpretation of flux trapping experiments in hydrides

On the "Author Correction: Magnetic field screening in hydrogen-rich high-temperature superconductors", Nat Commun 14, 5322 (2023)

Flux-trapping experiments on ultra-high pressure hydrides as evidence of superconductivity

Reply to "Is $MgB_2$ a superconductor? Comment on "Evidence Against Superconductivity in Flux Trapping Experiments on Hydrides Under High Pressure" "

Analysis of "Revaluation of the lower critical field in superconducting H_3S and LaH_10 (Nature Comm. 13, 3194, 2022)" by V. S. Minkov et al

Broadening of In-Field Superconducting Transitions in Hydrides

Comment on "Trapped magnetic flux in hydrogen-rich high-temperature superconductors" by V.S. Minkov, V. Ksenofontov, S.L. Bud'ko, E.F. Talantsev and M.I. Eremets

Revaluation of the lower critical field in superconducting H$_3$S and LaH$_{10}$ (Nature Comm. 13, 3194, 2022)

Trapped magnetic flux in superconducting hydrides

Are hydrides under high-pressure-high-temperature superconductors?

Flux trapping in hydrides not yet confirmed

High-temperature superconductivity in hydrides: experimental evidence and details

Clear evidence against superconductivity in hydrides under high pressure

Comment on "Evidence Against Superconductivity in Flux Trapping Experiments on Hydrides Under High Pressure"

Is MgB$_2$ a superconductor?

Absence of high temperature superconductivity in hydrides under pressure

High-temperature Superconductivity in Sulfur Hydride Evidenced by Alternating-Current Magnetic Susceptibility

On the trapped magnetic moment in type-II superconductors

Magnetic Methods in Studies of New Superconducting Hydrides in a Diamond Anvil Cell

Massive electrons and unconventional room-temperature superconductivity in superhydrides