Abstract:Quantum theory famously entails the existence of incompatible measurements, pairs of system observables which cannot be simultaneously measured to arbitrary precision. Incompatibility is widely regarded to be a uniquely quantum phenomenon, linked to failure to commute of quantum operators. Even in the face of deep parallels between quantum commutators and classical Poisson brackets, no connection has been established between the Poisson algebra and any intrinsic limitations to classical measurement. Here I examine measurement in classical Hamiltonian physics as a process involving the joint evolution of an object-system and a finite-temperature measuring apparatus. Instead of the ideal measurement capable of extracting information without disturbing the system, I find a Heisenberg-like precision-disturbance relation: Measuring an observable leaves all Poisson-commuting observables undisturbed but inevitably disturbs all non-Poisson-commuting observables. In this classical uncertainty relation the role of h-bar is played by an apparatus-specific quantity, q-bar. While this is not a universal constant, the analysis suggests that q-bar takes a finite positive value for any apparatus that can be built. (Specifically: q-bar vanishes in the model only in the unreachable limit of zero absolute temperature.) I show that a classical version of Ozawa's model of quantum measurement [Ozawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 , 385 (1988)], originally proposed as a means to violate Heisenberg's relation, does not violate the classical relation. If this result were to generalize to all models of measurement, then incompatibility would prove to be a feature not only of quantum, but of classical physics too. Put differently: The approach presented here points the way to studying the (Bayesian) epistemology of classical physics, which was until now assumed to be trivial. It now seems possible that it is nontrivial and bears a resemblance to the quantum formalism. The present findings may be of interest to researchers working on foundations of quantum mechanics, particularly for ψ -epistemic interpretations. More practically, there may be applications in the fields of precision measurement, nanoengineering, and molecular machines. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.110.024124 ©2024 American Physical Society

Origin of meter fluctuations in weak measurement interactions

Dependence of measurement outcomes on the dynamics of quantum coherent interactions between the system and the meter

Influence of Weak Measurement on Uncertainty Relations in a Quantum Dissipative System

Uncertainty limits of the information exchange between a quantum system and an external meter

Nonclassicality in Weak Measurements

Pedagogical Review of Quantum Measurement Theory with an Emphasis on Weak Measurements

Heisenberg scaling with weak measurement: a quantum state discrimination point of view

Asymptotic behavior of continuous weak measurement and its application to real-time parameter estimation

Metrology of weak quantum perturbations

Incompatible observables in classical physics: A closer look at measurement in Hamiltonian mechanics

Time-energy uncertainty relation for noisy quantum metrology

Broadening the scope of weak quantum measurements I: A single particle accurately measured yet left superposed

Quantum Mechanics of Successive Measurements with Arbitrary Meter Coupling

Experimental evaluation of non-classical correlations between measurement outcomes and target observable in a quantum measurement

Disturbance in weak measurements and the difference between quantum and classical weak values

Demystifying weak measurements

On the relevance of weak measurements in dissipative quantum systems

Does Decoherence Select the Pointer Basis of a Quantum Meter?

Quantum fluctuations, particles and entanglement: solving the quantum measurement problems

Beating Standard Quantum Limit with Weak Measurement