Abstract:Open access to data, as a core principle of open science, is predicated on assumptions that scientific data can be reused by other researchers. We test those assumptions by asking where scientists find reusable data, how they reuse those data, and how they interpret data they did not collect themselves. By conducting a qualitative meta-analysis of evidence on two long-term, distributed, interdisciplinary consortia, we found that scientists frequently sought data from public collections and from other researchers for comparative purposes such as "ground-truthing" and calibration. When they sought others' data for reanalysis or for combining with their own data, which was relatively rare, most preferred to collaborate with the data creators. We propose a typology of data reuses ranging from comparative to integrative. Comparative data reuse requires interactional expertise, which involves knowing enough about the data to assess their quality and value for a specific comparison such as calibrating an instrument in a lab experiment. Integrative reuse requires contributory expertise, which involves the ability to perform the action, such as reusing data in a new experiment. Data integration requires more specialized scientific knowledge and deeper levels of epistemic trust in the knowledge products. Metadata, ontologies, and other forms of curation benefit interpretation for any kind of data reuse. Based on these findings, we theorize the data creators' advantage, that those who create data have intimate and tacit knowledge that can be used as barter to form collaborations for mutual advantage. Data reuse is a process that occurs within knowledge infrastructures that evolve over time, encompassing expertise, trust, communities, technologies, policies, resources, and institutions. (See Supplementary Materials for methodological and other details, including a full bibliography.)

Data Repurposing through Compatibility: A Computational Perspective

Reviving Purpose Limitation and Data Minimisation in Data-Driven Systems

The practical ethics of repurposing health data: how to acknowledge invisible data work and the need for prioritization

Reusing Data Technical and Ethical Challenges

Uses and Reuses of Scientific Data: The Data Creators’ Advantage

Optimizing a Data Science System for Text Reuse Analysis

ReUseData: an R/Bioconductor tool for reusable and reproducible genomic data management

The Landscape of Data Reuse in Interactive Information Retrieval: Motivations, Sources, and Evaluation of Reusability

Repurposing of Resources: from Everyday Problem Solving through to Crisis Management

Understanding the provenance and quality of methods is essential for responsible reuse of FAIR data

Comparative legal study on privacy and personal data protection for robots equipped with artificial intelligence: looking at functional and technological aspects

An Analytical Review of Computational Drug Repurposing

Ensuring Purpose Limitation in Large-Scale Infrastructures with Provenance-Enabled Access Control

Automatically Detecting API-induced Compatibility Issues in Android Apps: A Comparative Analysis (Replicability Study)

From Data Creator to Data Reuser: Distance Matters

Reuse‐oriented Data Publishing: How to Make the Shared Research Data Friendlier for Researchers

Application and Legal Governance of Computational Technologies in Credit Investigation: an Interdisciplinary Perspective

Data Analysis in the Era of Generative AI

Computational drug repurposing based on electronic health records: a scoping review

Critical companionship: Some sensibilities for studying the lived experience of data subjects

How health technology assessment can help to address challenges in drug repurposing: a conceptual framework