Abstract:Because "out-of-the-box" large language models are capable of generating a great deal of objectionable content, recent work has focused on aligning these models in an attempt to prevent undesirable generation. While there has been some success at circumventing these measures -- so-called "jailbreaks" against LLMs -- these attacks have required significant human ingenuity and are brittle in practice. In this paper, we propose a simple and effective attack method that causes aligned language models to generate objectionable behaviors. Specifically, our approach finds a suffix that, when attached to a wide range of queries for an LLM to produce objectionable content, aims to maximize the probability that the model produces an affirmative response (rather than refusing to answer). However, instead of relying on manual engineering, our approach automatically produces these adversarial suffixes by a combination of greedy and gradient-based search techniques, and also improves over past automatic prompt generation methods. Surprisingly, we find that the adversarial prompts generated by our approach are quite transferable, including to black-box, publicly released LLMs. Specifically, we train an adversarial attack suffix on multiple prompts (i.e., queries asking for many different types of objectionable content), as well as multiple models (in our case, Vicuna-7B and 13B). When doing so, the resulting attack suffix is able to induce objectionable content in the public interfaces to ChatGPT, Bard, and Claude, as well as open source LLMs such as LLaMA-2-Chat, Pythia, Falcon, and others. In total, this work significantly advances the state-of-the-art in adversarial attacks against aligned language models, raising important questions about how such systems can be prevented from producing objectionable information. Code is available at <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://github.com/llm-attacks/llm-attacks" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a>.

Detecting Language Model Attacks with Perplexity

What You See Is Not Always What You Get: An Empirical Study of Code Comprehension by Large Language Models

An LLM can Fool Itself: A Prompt-Based Adversarial Attack

Exploring the Adversarial Capabilities of Large Language Models

Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models

Unleashing the Unseen: Harnessing Benign Datasets for Jailbreaking Large Language Models

Survey of Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models Revealed by Adversarial Attacks

Robustness of Large Language Models Against Adversarial Attacks

Human-Interpretable Adversarial Prompt Attack on Large Language Models with Situational Context

Human-Readable Adversarial Prompts: An Investigation into LLM Vulnerabilities Using Situational Context

Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Large Language Models: Old and New Threats

Token-Level Adversarial Prompt Detection Based on Perplexity Measures and Contextual Information

A Realistic Threat Model for Large Language Model Jailbreaks

AmpleGCG-Plus: A Strong Generative Model of Adversarial Suffixes to Jailbreak LLMs with Higher Success Rates in Fewer Attempts

SmoothLLM: Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks

Sandwich attack: Multi-language Mixture Adaptive Attack on LLMs

Imposter.AI: Adversarial Attacks with Hidden Intentions towards Aligned Large Language Models

PRP: Propagating Universal Perturbations to Attack Large Language Model Guard-Rails

Perplexed: Understanding When Large Language Models are Confused

Probing the Safety Response Boundary of Large Language Models via Unsafe Decoding Path Generation

Understanding the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Detecting Security Vulnerabilities