On the most reliable value of the Galactic aberration constant

Zinovy Malkin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/2515-5172/ace050
2023-08-25
Abstract:Galactic aberration (GA) is a small effect in proper motions of celestial objects with an amplitude of about 5 $\mu$as/yr already noticeable in highly accurate astrometric observations such as VLBI and Gaia. However accurate accounting for this effect faces difficulty caused by the uncertainty in the GA amplitude (GA constant). Its estimates derived from VLBI and Gaia data processing differ significantly, so it would be very desirable to involve another independent method to solve the problem of inconsistency between these two methods. Such a method, that we consider in this paper, is using determination of the Galactic rotation parameters by methods of stellar astronomy. The result obtained in this study showed that the GA constant estimate obtained from stellar astronomy is closer to the estimate obtained from Gaia.
Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics,Astrophysics of Galaxies
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to solve the problem of inconsistent estimates of the Galactic Aberration (GA) constant. Specifically, there are significant differences in the GA constant values obtained through VLBI (Very Long Baseline Interferometry) and Gaia satellite data processing. To bridge the inconsistency between these two methods, the author introduced another independent method, that is, using the methods of stellar astronomy to determine the Galactic rotation parameters to estimate the GA constant. ### Problem Background Galactic aberration is a small effect caused by the centripetal acceleration of the solar system (more precisely, the Local Standard of Rest frame, LSR) towards the Galactic center, which has become significant in high - precision astrometric observations, such as VLBI and Gaia satellite data. The maximum magnitude of this effect is approximately 5 micro - arcseconds per year (µas/yr), which can be called the GA constant \( A \). ### Main Problems 1. **Differences between Different Methods**: - The GA constant obtained from VLBI absolute astrometry is \( A = 5.8 \pm 0.3 \, \mu\text{as/yr} \). - The GA constant obtained from the methods of stellar astronomy is \( A=(4.9 \ldots 5.0) \pm(0.2 \ldots 0.3) \, \mu\text{as/yr} \). - The GA constant obtained from Gaia satellite observations is \( A = 5.05 \pm 0.35 \, \mu\text{as/yr} \), which is closer to the result of stellar astronomy. 2. **Need for New Independent Estimates**: - Due to the differences between VLBI and Gaia results, the author hopes to provide a new and more reliable estimate of the GA constant through the methods of stellar astronomy. ### Research Methods The author used the recent research results of simultaneously determining Galactic rotation parameters (such as the distance from the Sun to the Galactic center \( R_0 \) and the Galactic rotation speed \( V_0 \)) to re - evaluate the GA constant \( A \). The specific formula is as follows: \[ A=\frac{V_0 \Omega_0}{c}=\frac{R_0 \Omega_0^2}{c}=\frac{V_0^2}{R_0 c} \] where: - \( R_0 \) is the distance from the Sun to the Galactic center, - \( V_0 \) and \( \Omega_0 \) are the linear velocity and angular velocity of the LSR rotating around the Galactic center respectively, - \( c \) is the speed of light. ### Results and Conclusions Through a comprehensive analysis of Galactic rotation parameters in multiple literatures, the author obtained a new estimate of the GA constant \( A = 4.7 \pm 0.1 \, \mu\text{as/yr} \). This result is closer to the result of Gaia satellite \( A = 5.05 \pm 0.35 \, \mu\text{as/yr} \), and compared with the VLBI - based estimate \( A = 5.8 \pm 0.3 \, \mu\text{as/yr} \), it may indicate that the latter may be overestimated. ### Discussion Nevertheless, the author also pointed out that since many of the cited literatures are based on the same observational data, the uncertainty of the current estimate may be underestimated. This indicates that further research is still needed in the future to improve the accuracy of GA constant estimates.