Understanding differences of the OA uptake within the Germany university landscape (2010-2020) -- Part 2: repository-provided OA

Niels Taubert,Anne Hobert,Najko Jahn,Andre Bruns,Elham Iravani

2023-08-23

Abstract:This study investigates the determinants for the uptake of institutional and subject repository Open Access (OA) in the university landscape of Germany and considers three factors: the disciplinary profile of universities, their OA infrastructures and services and large transformative agreements. The uptake of OA as well as the determinants are measured by combining several data sources (incl. Web of Science, Unpaywall, an authority file of standardised German affiliation information, the ISSN-Gold-OA 4.0 list, and lists of publications covered by transformative agreements). For universities OA infrastructures and services, a structured data collection was created by harvesting different sources of information and by manual online search. To determine the explanatory power of the different factors, a series of regression analyses was performed for different periods and for both institutional as well as subject repository OA. As a result of the regression analyses, the most determining factor for the explanation of differences in the uptake of both repository OA-types turned out to be the disciplinary profile, whereas all variables that capture local infrastructural support and services for OA turned out to be non-significant. The outcome of the regression analyses is contextualised by an interview study conducted with 20 OA officers of German universities. The contextualisation provides hints that the original function of institutional repositories, offering a channel for secondary publishing is vanishing, while a new function of aggregation of metadata and full texts is becoming of increasing importance.

Digital Libraries

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the determinants of open access (OA) adoption provided by institutional and disciplinary repositories in the German university environment. Specifically, the research focuses on three factors:

1. **Disciplinary characteristics**: Different disciplines vary in their acceptance of OA and the time points. Therefore, the disciplinary composition of a university is considered an important factor affecting its OA adoption rate.
2. **OA infrastructure and services**: The degree of infrastructure and services supporting OA provided by German universities varies. These infrastructures and services include institutional repositories (IR) for archiving research, as well as providing OA officers, OA websites, training activities, etc.
3. **Transformation agreements**: Transformation agreements have been introduced in recent years, especially those between large publishers and the project DEAL. These agreements increase the amount of OA content by making all publications in the publisher's journal portfolio freely available online for member institutions, and this content can also be aggregated in repositories.

To explore the influence of these factors, the author conducted a regression analysis and combined multiple data sources (such as Web of Science, Unpaywall, the standardized German institutional information authority file, the ISSN - Gold - OA 4.0 list, and the list of publications covered under the transformation agreements). In addition, the author also collected data on university OA infrastructure and services through a structured data collection method from different information sources and manual online searches.

Through these analyses, the research aims to answer the following questions:
- How do disciplinary characteristics affect the OA adoption of institutional and disciplinary repositories?
- How do OA infrastructure and services affect OA adoption?
- How do transformation agreements affect OA adoption?

Finally, the study found that disciplinary characteristics are the most important factor in explaining the differences in OA adoption between the two types of repositories, while all variables reflecting local infrastructure support and services are not significant. The research results are also contextualized through interviews with 20 OA officers in German universities, providing clues about the functional transformation of institutional repositories, that is, the transformation of institutional repositories from secondary publishing channels to important platforms for metadata and full - text aggregation.