Abstract:Federated learning (FL) provides autonomy and privacy by design to participating peers, who cooperatively build a machine learning (ML) model while keeping their private data in their devices. However, that same autonomy opens the door for malicious peers to poison the model by conducting either untargeted or targeted poisoning attacks. The label-flipping (LF) attack is a targeted poisoning attack where the attackers poison their training data by flipping the labels of some examples from one class (i.e., the source class) to another (i.e., the target class). Unfortunately, this attack is easy to perform and hard to detect, and it negatively impacts the performance of the global model. Existing defenses against LF are limited by assumptions on the distribution of the peers' data and/or do not perform well with high-dimensional models. In this paper, we deeply investigate the LF attack behavior. We find that the contradicting objectives of attackers and honest peers on the source class examples are reflected on the parameter gradients corresponding to the neurons of the source and target classes in the output layer. This makes those gradients good discriminative features for the attack detection. Accordingly, we propose LFighter, a novel defense against the LF attack that first dynamically extracts those gradients from the peers' local updates and then clusters the extracted gradients, analyzes the resulting clusters, and filters out potential bad updates before model aggregation. Extensive empirical analysis on three data sets shows the effectiveness of the proposed defense regardless of the data distribution or model dimensionality. Also, LFighter outperforms several state-of-the-art defenses by offering lower test error, higher overall accuracy, higher source class accuracy, lower attack success rate, and higher stability of the source class accuracy. Our code and data are available for reproducibility purposes at https://github.com/NajeebJebreel/LFighter.

Pelta: Shielding Transformers to Mitigate Evasion Attacks in Federated Learning

Shielding Federated Learning Systems against Inference Attacks with ARM TrustZone

Mitigating communications threats in decentralized federated learning through moving target defense

Celtibero: Robust Layered Aggregation for Federated Learning

LeadFL: Client Self-Defense against Model Poisoning in Federated Learning

Mitigating Data Injection Attacks on Federated Learning

PEFT-as-an-Attack! Jailbreaking Language Models during Federated Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning

FLEDGE: Ledger-based Federated Learning Resilient to Inference and Backdoor Attacks

Network-Level Adversaries in Federated Learning

Mitigating Evasion Attacks in Federated Learning-Based Signal Classifiers

Dynamic Defense Against Byzantine Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning

Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lens

FedTruth: Byzantine-Robust and Backdoor-Resilient Federated Learning Framework

LFighter: Defending against the label-flipping attack in federated learning

Adaptive Selection of Loss Function for Federated Learning Clients Under Adversarial Attacks

FedDefender: Client-Side Attack-Tolerant Federated Learning

Certified Federated Adversarial Training

A Four-Pronged Defense Against Byzantine Attacks in Federated Learning

Avoid Adversarial Adaption in Federated Learning by Multi-Metric Investigations

How To Backdoor Federated Learning