Contribution to ǫ ′ / ǫ from anomalous gauge couplings
Xiao-Gang He
1999-01-01
Abstract:Recently KTev collaboration has measured Re(ǫ/ǫ) = (28 ± 4.1) × 10−4 which is in agreement with early measurement from NA31. The Standard Model prediction for ǫ/ǫ is on the lower end of the experimentally allowed range depending on models for hadronic matrix elements. In this paper we study the contributions from anomalous gauge couplings. We find that the contributions from anomalous couplings can be significant and can ehance ǫ/ǫ to have a value closer to data. PACS numbers: Typeset using REVTEX 1 The parameter ǫ/ǫ measuring direct CP violation in K → ππ is a very important quantity to study [1]. A non-zero value Re(ǫ/ǫ) = (2.3 ± 0.65) × 10 was first measured by NA31 experiment [2], but E731 experiment with similar sensitivity did not confirm it [3]. This controverse is now settled with the measurement of Re(ǫ/ǫ) = (2.8 ± 0.41) × 10 by KTev experiment [4]. The parameter ǫ/ǫ is different from the parameter ǫ which characterizes CP violation in K0−K̄0 mixing. CP violation due to mixing was first observed in 1964. Before the measurement of ǫ/ǫ the non-zero value [5] ǫ = 2.266×eiφǫ with φǫ ≈ π/4 is the only laboratory experimental evidence for CP violation. Many models have been proposed to explain the non-zero value for ǫ [6]. One class of models is the superweak models [7] of CP violation which postulate that there is a new ∆S = 2 interaction causing mixing and CP violation in K − K̄ system. In such models, there is no CP violation in ∆S = 1 interaction and ǫ/ǫ is predicted to be zero. Therefore the confirmation of non-zero ǫ/ǫ, now, decisively rules out superweak models. There are other models, such as the standard Kobayashi-Maskawa model (SM) [8], and the multi-Higgs model [9], which not only violate CP in ∆S = 2, but also in ∆S = 1 interactions. These non-superweak models with different CP violating mechanisms can explain the measured ǫ and predict, in general, different values for ǫ/ǫ. It is clear that ǫ/ǫ can provide further information about models for CP violation. In the SM the predicted value for ǫ/ǫ, although in the lower end allowed by experiment as will be seen later, is not in conflict with data. More studies on the uncertainties associated with the relevant hadronic matrix elements are needed. There is also the possibility that new physics does contribute and alter the SM prediction significantly. In this paper we reanalyse the anomalous gauge coupling effects on ǫ/ǫ in a similar way as in Ref. [10]. We find that the anomalous couplings can affect ǫ/ǫ significantly. Using the measured value for ǫ/ǫ, one can also constrain the allowed range for the anomalous couplings. The CP violating ∆S = 1 interaction responsible for K → ππ decays in the SM is dominated by the strong penguin contributions which contribute to I = 0 amplitude A0 only. The contributions due to electroweak penguins which contribute to both I = 0 and 2 I = 2 amplitudes A0 and A2, are small. However the electroweak penguins contribute to ǫ /ǫ significantly because there is a well-known enhancement factor 1/ω = ReA0/ReA2 = 22.2 for I = 2 contributions [11]. For the same reason, although the contributions from anomalous couplings are similar in size to those from the electroweak penguins, these contributions having both I = 0 and I = 2 components can thus affect ǫ/ǫ significantly. The most general WWV interactions with the W gauge boson on-shell and invariant under U(1)em can be parametrized as [12] LV = −igV [κ W μ W ν V μν + λ mW W σρW V σ δ + κ̃ W μ W − ν Ṽ μν + λ̃ mW W σρW Ṽ σ δ + g 1 (W W μν − W μ W)Vν + g 4 W μ W ν (∂V ν + ∂V ) + g 5 ǫμναβ(W ∂W − ∂WW)V ], (1) where W are the W boson fields; V can be the γ or Z fields; Wμν and Vμν are the W and V field strengths, respectively; and W̃ (Ṽ )μν = ǫμναβW (V ) /2. The terms proportional to κ, λ, and g1,5 are CP conserving and κ̃, λ̃, and g Z 4 are CP violating. Our convention is that for V = γ, gV = e and for V = Z, gV = g cos θW . g γ 1 defines the W boson charge and is always normalized to 1. In the SM at the tree level, κ and g 1 are equal to 1, and all others are zero. We refer ∆κ = κ − 1, ∆g 1 − 1, κ̃ , λ̃, g 4 and g 5 as anomalous couplings. With non-zero anomalous couplings, at the energy scale μ = mW beside the SM effective Hamiltonian HSM for ∆S = 1 interaction, there are additional contributions [10] HAC = GF αem 2 √ 2π ∑