Abstract:With rising shares of renewables and the need to properly assess trade-offs between transmission, storage and sectoral integration as balancing options, building a bridge between energy system models and detailed power flow studies becomes increasingly important, but is computationally challenging. W compare approximations for two nonlinear phenomena, power flow and transmission losses, in linear capacity expansion problems that co-optimise investments in generation, storage and transmission infrastructure. We evaluate different flow representations discussing differences in investment decisions, nodal prices, the deviation of optimised flows and losses from simulated AC power flows, and the computational performance. By using the open European power system model PyPSA-Eur we obtain detailed and reproducible results aiming at facilitating the selection of a suitable power flow model. Given the differences in complexity, the optimal choice depends on the application, the user's available computational resources, and the level of spatial detail considered. Although the commonly used transport model can already identify key features of a cost-efficient system while being computationally performant, deficiencies under high loading conditions arise due to the lack of a physical grid representation. Moreover, disregarding transmission losses overestimates optimal grid expansion by 20%. Adding a convex relaxation of quadratic losses with two or three tangents to the linearised power flow equations and accounting for changing line impedances as the network is reinforced suffices to represent power flows and losses adequately in design studies. We show that the obtained investment and dispatch decisions are then sufficiently physical to be used in more detailed nonlinear simulations of AC power flow in order to better assess their technical feasibility.

A general method for estimating zonal transmission interface limits from nodal network data

Indirect Heat Integration Across Plants: Novel Representation of Intermediate Fluid Circles

Power transfer limit calculation for multi-area interconnected power networks

A Distributed Power Transfer Limit Calculation Method for Multi-Area Interconnection Power Networks

A Scenario-classification Hybrid-based Banding Method for Power Transfer Limits of Critical Inter-corridors

Interactive Transmission Network Planning Using a Least-Effort Criterion

Power Flow Solvers for Direct Current Networks

On the Available Transfer Region of Power Grids Via Projection-based Algorithm

A Modified Implicit Z-Matrix Method for Power Flow Study of Advanced Distribution Systems

Transmission Section Economic Available Transfer Capability with Security Constraints

Algorithm of Power Flow for Bulk Interconnected Grid with Transmission Interface Power Constraints

Min–max transfer capabilities of transmission interfaces

AC-Feasible Power Transfer Regions of Virtual Power Plants: Characterization and Application

Dynamic Calculation Method for Zonal Carbon Emissions in Power Systems Based on the Theory of Production Simulation and Carbon Emission Flow Theory

A study of interline power flow analysis based on a new mathematical model of interconnected power system with IPC

Risk quantitative assessment of emergency control measures to improve power grid transmission capacity

Identification of Vulnerable Transmission Lines in Power System Based on Game Theory

Transmission Network Planning Using Linear Programming

Phase shifter placement in large-scale systems via mixed integer linear programming

A Pragmatic Method to Determine Transient Stability Constrained with Interface Real Power Flow Limits Via Power System Scenario Similarity

Approximating Power Flow and Transmission Losses in Coordinated Capacity Expansion Problems