Abstract:One approach to testing general relativity (GR) introduces free parameters in the post-Newtonian (PN) expansion of the gravitational-wave (GW) phase. If systematic errors on these testing GR (TGR) parameters exceed the statistical errors, this may signal a false violation of GR. Here, we consider systematic errors produced by unmodeled binary eccentricity. Since the eccentricity of GW events in ground-based detectors is expected to be small or negligible, the use of quasicircular waveform models for testing GR may be safe when analyzing a small number of events. However, as the catalog size of GW detections increases, more stringent bounds on GR deviations can be placed by combining information from multiple events. In that case, even small systematic biases may become significant. We apply the approach of hierarchical Bayesian inference to model the posterior probability distributions of the TGR parameters inferred from a population of eccentric binary black holes (BBHs). We assume each TGR parameter value varies across the BBH population according to a Gaussian distribution. The means and standard deviations that parametrize these Gaussians are related to the statistical and systematic errors measured for each BBH event. We compute the posterior distributions for these Gaussian hyperparameters , characterizing the BBH population via three possible eccentricity distributions. This is done for LIGO and Cosmic Explorer (CE, a proposed third-generation detector). We find that systematic biases from unmodeled eccentricity can signal false GR violations for both detectors when considering constraints set by a catalog of events. We also compute the projected bounds on the 10 TGR parameters when eccentricity is included as a parameter in the waveform model. This is done via multiplying the individual likelihoods for each event in the catalog, and also by combining them via hierarchical inference. We find that the first four dimensionless TGR deformation parameters can be bounded at 90% confidence to δφ^i≲10−2 for LIGO and ≲10−3 for CE [where i=(0,1,2,3) ; GR predicts zero for all values of the δφ^i ]. The most stringent bound applies to the −1PN (dipole) parameter: it is constrained to |δφ^−2|≲10−5 ( ≲4×10−7 ) by LIGO (CE). In comparison to the circular orbit case, the combined bounds on the TGR parameters worsen by a modest factor of ≲2 when eccentricity is included in the waveform. (The dipole parameter bound degrades by a factor of ∼3–4 in this case). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.084056 © 2024 American Physical Society

Earthquakes as probing tools for gravity theories

Planetary seismology as a test of modified gravity proposals

Bose-Einstein Condensate and Liquid Helium He$^4$: Implications of GUP and Modified Gravity Correspondence

Bose-Einstein condensate and liquid : Implications of the GUP and modified gravity correspondence

Constraining Gravitational and Cosmological Parameters with Astrophysical Data

Bayesian investigation of the neutron star equation of state vs gravity degeneracy

Testing Gravity with the CFHTLS-Wide Cosmic Shear Survey and SDSS LRGs

Probing Gravity -- Fundamental Aspects of Metric Theories and their Implications for Tests of General Relativity

A Bayesian investigation of the neutron star equation-of-state vs. gravity degeneracy

Unveiling Phase Space Modifications: A Clash of Modified Gravity and the Generalized Uncertainty Principle

A new test of gravity - I: Introduction to the method

A new test of gravity -- I: Introduction to the method

Model Comparison tests of modified gravity from the Eöt-Wash experiment

Eccentricity-induced systematic error on parametrized tests of general relativity: Hierarchical Bayesian inference applied to a binary black hole population

Palatini $f(R)$ gravity tests in the weak field limit: Solar System, seismology and galaxies

Testing Gravity in the Laboratory

Constraining models of $f(R)$ gravity with Planck and WiggleZ power spectrum data

Probing Early Modification of Gravity with Planck, ACT and SPT

Gravitational Effect on Fundamental Physical Observables

Testing theories of gravity with planetary ephemerides

Subtleties in constraining gravity theories with mass-radius data