Lankeswar Dey,Maura A. McLaughlin,Haley M. Wahl,Paul B. Demorest,Zaven Arzoumanian,Harsha Blumer,Paul R. Brook,Sarah Burke-Spolaor,H. Thankful Cromartie,Megan E. DeCesar,Timothy Dolch,Justin A. Ellis,Robert D. Ferdman,Elizabeth C. Ferrara,William Fiore,Emmanuel Fonseca,Nate Garver-Daniels,Peter A. Gentile,Joseph Glaser,Deborah C. Good,Ross J. Jennings,Megan L. Jones,Michael T. Lam,Duncan R. Lorimer,Jing Luo,Ryan S. Lynch,Cherry Ng,David J. Nice,Timothy T. Pennucci,Nihan S. Pol,Scott M. Ransom,Renée Spiewak,Ingrid H. Stairs,Kevin Stovall,Joseph K. Swiggum

Abstract:Pulsar timing array experiments have recently uncovered evidence for a nanohertz gravitational wave background by precisely timing an ensemble of millisecond pulsars. The next significant milestones for these experiments include characterizing the detected background with greater precision, identifying its source(s), and detecting continuous gravitational waves from individual supermassive black hole binaries. To achieve these objectives, generating accurate and precise times of arrival of pulses from pulsar observations is crucial. Incorrect polarization calibration of the observed pulsar profiles may introduce errors in the measured times of arrival. Further, previous studies (e.g., van Straten 2013; Manchester et al. 2013) have demonstrated that robust polarization calibration of pulsar profiles can reduce noise in the pulsar timing data and improve timing solutions. In this paper, we investigate and compare the impact of different polarization calibration methods on pulsar timing precision using three distinct calibration techniques: the Ideal Feed Assumption (IFA), Measurement Equation Modeling (MEM), and Measurement Equation Template Matching (METM). Three NANOGrav pulsars-PSRs J1643$-$1224, J1744$-$1134, and J1909$-$3744-observed with the 800 MHz and 1.5 GHz receivers at the Green Bank Telescope (GBT) are utilized for our analysis. Our findings reveal that all three calibration methods enhance timing precision compared to scenarios where no polarization calibration is performed. Additionally, among the three calibration methods, the IFA approach generally provides the best results for timing analysis of pulsars observed with the GBT receiver system. We attribute the comparatively poorer performance of the MEM and METM methods to potential instabilities in the reference noise diode coupled to the receiver and temporal variations in the profile of the reference pulsar, respectively.

Improving pulsar polarization and timing measurements with the Nançay Radio Telescope

Exploring pulsar timing precision: A comparative study of polarization calibration methods for NANOGrav data from the Green Bank Telescope

Reducing instrumental errors in Parkes Pulsar Timing Array data

The NANOGrav 12.5-Year Data Set: Polarimetry and Faraday Rotation Measures from Observations of Millisecond Pulsars with the Green Bank Telescope

Measuring Pulse Times of Arrival from Broad-Band Pulsar Observations

Improving pulsar timing precision through superior Time-of-Arrival creation

Pulse Profile Variability of PSR J1022+1001 in NANOGrav Data

Prospects for High-Precision Pulsar Timing with the New Effelsberg PSRIX Backend

Prospects for High-Precision Pulsar Timing

The NANOGrav 11-Year Data Set: Arecibo Observatory Polarimetry And Pulse Microcomponents

Improving pulsar-timing solutions through dynamic pulse fitting

A Revisit of PSR J1909−3744 with 15-Yr High-Precision Timing

The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array Project: Second data release

Radio Astronomical Polarimetry and High-Precision Pulsar Timing

The Northern High Time Resolution Universe Pulsar Survey I: Setup and initial discoveries

A 24 HR GLOBAL CAMPAIGN TO ASSESS PRECISION TIMING OF THE MILLISECOND PULSAR J1713+0747

The NANOGrav 11-year Data Set: High-precision Timing of 45 Millisecond Pulsars

Timing Gamma-ray Pulsars with the Fermi Large Area Telescope: Timing Noise and Astrometry

Improving Pulsar Timing Precision with Single Pulse Fluence Clustering