Interpreting Observed Interactions between Near-Inertial Waves and Mesoscale Eddies

Scott Conn,Joseph Fitzgerald,Jörn Callies
2024-01-04
Abstract:The evolution of wind-generated near-inertial waves (NIWs) is known to be influenced by the mesoscale eddy field, yet it remains a challenge to disentangle the effects of this interaction in observations. Here, the model of Young and Ben Jelloul (YBJ), which describes NIW evolution in the presence of slowly evolving mesoscale eddies, is compared to observations from a mooring array in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean. The model captures the evolution of both the observed NIW amplitude and phase much more accurately than a slab mixed layer model. The YBJ model allows for the identification of specific physical processes that drive the observed evolution. It reveals that differences in the NIW amplitude across the mooring array are caused by the refractive concentration of NIWs into anticyclones. Advection and wave dispersion also make important contributions to the observed wave evolution. Stimulated generation, a process by which mesoscale kinetic energy acts as a source of NIW potential energy, is estimated to be 20$\mu$W/m$^2$ in the region of the mooring array, which is two orders of magnitude smaller than the global average input to mesoscale kinetic energy and likely not an important contribution to the mesoscale kinetic energy budget in this region. Overall, the results show that the YBJ model is a quantitatively useful tool to interpret observations of NIWs.
Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to address the problem of how to explain the observed near-inertial wave (NIW) evolution in the context of interactions with mesoscale vortices. Specifically: 1. **Application of Theoretical Framework**: The paper uses the Young and Ben Jelloul (YBJ) model to explain the near-inertial wave data observed in the northeastern North Atlantic. The YBJ model can more accurately capture the observed changes in the amplitude and phase of near-inertial waves, offering significant advantages over traditional mixed-layer models. 2. **Identification of Physical Processes**: The YBJ model helps identify the specific physical processes leading to the observed phenomena. For example, the amplitude differences of near-inertial waves in the observation array are caused by the refraction and focusing of near-inertial waves into anticyclonic regions. Additionally, convection and wave dispersion also significantly contribute to the observed wave evolution. 3. **Energy Transfer Mechanism**: The paper also explores the stimulation generation process, where mesoscale kinetic energy acts as a source of potential energy for near-inertial waves. However, in the study area, the energy input from this process is relatively small and may not be a major contributor to the mesoscale kinetic energy budget. In summary, this paper aims to use the YBJ model as a quantitative tool to better understand and explain the evolution of near-inertial waves in the presence of a mesoscale vortex background.