Abstract:This study sought to investigate whether scholarly impact and academic influence differ between men and women in the field of communication and the extent to which the gender gap has persisted on social media platforms, an arena increasingly used for research dissemination. Data were collected from 10,736 articles, published in prominent communication journals between 2012 and 2022, using a combination of three sources: OpenAlex, Altmetric, and Twitter. The gender of 6,827 first authors was identified using ChatGPT, with an accuracy of 0.94. The findings confirmed the presence of the Matilda effect, indicating a bias toward male scholars in terms of research performance, academic mobility, and online popularity. Furthermore, the study revealed uneven gains between male and female scholars in their use of social media for research dissemination. These results have implications for how science communities can effectively promote research on social media. Social media is often seen as a potential tool to overcome the barriers faced by women in science; however, its effect on academic equality remains uncertain. This study seeks to investigate whether promoting research on Twitter narrowed or perpetuated the gender gap among communication scholars. The analysis involved examining the publication records of 6,827 scholars who published articles as first authors in prominent communication journals. This study offers a significant contribution by surpassing previous research and considering the entire academic careers across both offline and online domains. Factors such as the number of publications, total citations received, mobility, collaboration networks, and online popularity were considered. The findings of the study reveal that despite there being more female scholars in the field, male scholars experienced high-level of productivity, mobility, and online popularity. Furthermore, the gender gap in communication is amplified by social media, with male scholars gaining more citations through using social media for research dissemination. Recognizing these unequal benefits gained from social media use can help shape strategies aimed at enhancing gender equity, diversity, and inclusivity in communication research. By understanding and addressing these disparities, steps can be taken toward establishing a more equitable academic environment.

Who benefits from altmetrics? The effect of team gender composition on the link between online visibility and citation impact

Gender inequities in the online dissemination of scholars’ work

Gender, Age, and Broader Impact: A Study of Persons, Not Just Authors.

Evidence of Gender Disparities in Citations and Altmetric Attention Score in Oncology

Modeling observed gender imbalances in academic citation practices

Can Social Media Combat Gender Inequalities in Academia? Measuring the Prevalence of the Matilda Effect in Communication

Gender and collaboration patterns in a temporal scientific authorship network

Does society show differential attention to researchers based on gender and field?

The Continuity and Citation Impact of Scientific Collaboration with Different Gender Composition

The Myth of Meritocracy and the Matilda Effect in STEM: Paper Acceptance and Paper Citation

GENDER DIVERSITY IN RESEARCH TEAMS AND CITATION IMPACT IN ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT

The Effect of Gender in the Publication Patterns in Mathematics

Examining the Influence of Women Scientists on Scientific Impact and Novelty: Insights from Top Business Journals

Gender disparities in the dissemination and acquisition of scientific knowledge

The hidden gender effect in online collaboration: An experimental study of team performance under anonymity

Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines

Biases in gendered citation practices: an exploratory study and some reflections on the Matthew and Matilda effects

Gender-Specific Patterns in the Artificial Intelligence Scientific Ecosystem

Do females create higher impact research? Scopus citations and Mendeley readers for articles from five countries

The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists

Differential correction of gender imbalance for top-cited scientists across scientific subfields over time