Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

Accuracy Improvement in Differentially Private Logistic Regression: A Pre-training Approach

Unlocking Accuracy and Fairness in Differentially Private Image Classification

Private Knowledge Transfer via Model Distillation with Generative Adversarial Networks

Improving Differentially Private Models with Active Learning

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Pre-training Differentially Private Models with Limited Public Data

Evaluating Differentially Private Machine Learning in Practice

Training Private Models That Know What They Don't Know

Optimal Differentially Private Model Training with Public Data

Differentially Private Language Models Benefit from Public Pre-training

DPAdapter: Improving Differentially Private Deep Learning through Noise Tolerance Pre-training

Differentially Private Optimizers Can Learn Adversarially Robust Models

Pre-Pruning and Gradient-Dropping Improve Differentially Private Image Classification

Not one but many Tradeoffs: Privacy Vs. Utility in Differentially Private Machine Learning

Improving the Privacy and Practicality of Objective Perturbation for Differentially Private Linear Learners

Mitigating Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy in Differentially Private Learning.

Noise-Aware Differentially Private Regression via Meta-Learning

Does Differential Privacy Impact Bias in Pretrained NLP Models?

Chasing Your Long Tails: Differentially Private Prediction in Health Care Settings

Rethinking Improved Privacy-Utility Trade-off with Pre-existing Knowledge for DP Training

Differentially Private Continual Learning using Pre-Trained Models