Abstract:The disagreement between low- and high-redshift measurements of the Hubble parameter is emerging as a serious challenge to the standard model of cosmology. We develop a covariant cosmographic analysis of the Hubble parameter in a general spacetime, which is fully model-independent and can thus be used as part of a robust assessment of the tension. Here our focus is not on the tension but on understanding the relation between the physical expansion rate and its measurement by observers -- which is critical for model-independent measurements and tests. We define the physical Hubble parameter and its multipoles in a general spacetime and derive for the first time the covariant boost transformation of the multipoles measured by a heliocentric observer. The analysis is extended to the covariant deceleration parameter. Current cosmographic measurements of the expansion anisotropy contain discrepancies and disagreements, some of which may arise because the correct transformations for a moving observer are not applied. A heliocentric observer will detect a dipole, generated not only by a Doppler effect, but also by an aberration effect due to shear. In principle, the observer can measure both the intrinsic shear anisotropy and the velocity of the observer relative to the matter -- without any knowledge of peculiar velocities, which are gauge dependent and do not arise in a covariant approach. The practical implementation of these results is investigated in a follow-up paper. We further show that the standard cosmographic relation between the Hubble parameter, the redshift and the luminosity distance (or magnitude) is not invariant under boosts and holds only in the matter frame. A moving observer who applies the standard cosmographic relation should correct the luminosity distance by a redshift factor -- otherwise an incorrect dipole and a spurious octupole are predicted.

The skewness of the distance-redshift relation in $Λ$CDM

The skewness of the distance-redshift relation in ΛCDM

How does the cosmic large-scale structure bias the Hubble diagram?

Galaxy skew-spectra in redshift-space

Theoretical and numerical perspectives on cosmic distance averages

Large-Scale Structure and the Redshift-Distance Relation

Testing gravity on large scales. The skewness of the galaxy distribution at z~1

Tensions with the flat $\boldsymbolΛ$CDM model from high-redshift cosmography

Bias and scatter in the Hubble diagram from cosmological large-scale structure

Putting Flat $Λ$CDM In The (Redshift) Bin

Relative distances and peculiar velicities of 140 groups and clusters of galaxies at low redshifts: the Hubble diagram

Towards Cosmography of the Local Universe

Cosmography and flat Λ CDM tensions at high redshift

A Simple Direct Empirical Observation of Systematic Bias of the Redshift as a Distance Indicator

Covariant cosmography: the observer-dependence of the Hubble parameter

Luminosity dependence of the spatial and velocity distributions of galaxies: semi-analytic models versus the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

Relativistic distortions in galaxy density-ellipticity correlations: gravitational redshift and peculiar velocity effects

Relative Distances and Peculiar Velocities of 140 Groups and Clusters of Galaxies at Low Redshifts: the Hubble Diagram

The 3-point function in large scale structure: redshift distortions and galaxy bias