How to use LLMs for Text Analysis

Petter Törnberg
2023-07-25
Abstract:This guide introduces Large Language Models (LLM) as a highly versatile text analysis method within the social sciences. As LLMs are easy-to-use, cheap, fast, and applicable on a broad range of text analysis tasks, ranging from text annotation and classification to sentiment analysis and critical discourse analysis, many scholars believe that LLMs will transform how we do text analysis. This how-to guide is aimed at students and researchers with limited programming experience, and offers a simple introduction to how LLMs can be used for text analysis in your own research project, as well as advice on best practices. We will go through each of the steps of analyzing textual data with LLMs using Python: installing the software, setting up the API, loading the data, developing an analysis prompt, analyzing the text, and validating the results. As an illustrative example, we will use the challenging task of identifying populism in political texts, and show how LLMs move beyond the existing state-of-the-art.
Computation and Language,Artificial Intelligence
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores the application of Large Language Models (LLM) in the analysis of social science texts, aiming to address the limitations of traditional text analysis methods, such as the need for deep expertise, extensive manual coding of training data, and inadequacies in handling sarcasm and contextual understanding. Specifically, the paper attempts to address the following key issues: 1. **Simplify Text Analysis**: LLMs are easy to use, cost-effective, and fast, suitable for a wide range of text analysis tasks, including text annotation, classification, sentiment analysis, and critical discourse analysis, etc. This enables students and researchers without programming experience to conduct text analysis. 2. **Improve Analysis Accuracy**: Traditional natural language processing and machine learning methods often have limited accuracy when dealing with complex language phenomena (such as sarcasm, context-dependent interpretations). LLMs demonstrate the ability to transcend these limitations, capable of performing almost any text analysis task, and in some cases, outperform human experts. 3. **Standardization and Reproducibility**: LLMs provide standardized and reproducible methods for text analysis, which helps to reduce biases in manual analysis, enhance research rigor and data quality, especially in large-scale text analyses. 4. **Cross-Domain Applicability**: The paper points out that LLMs are not only suitable for specific tasks but can also adapt to different types of text analysis challenges without the need for retraining, such as identifying populist tendencies in political texts. 5. **Challenging the Quantitative-Qualitative Analysis Boundaries**: By making new analysis tasks possible, LLMs blur the traditional boundaries between quantitative and qualitative research fields, promoting the integration of analytical methods in social sciences. The paper illustrates how to use LLM for text analysis with a concrete example—measuring populism in political texts—demonstrating how this technology can solve long-standing issues with quantifying complex concepts. Additionally, the paper discusses the limitations and potential biases to consider when using LLMs for text analysis, emphasizing the importance of validating results and ethical considerations. In summary, the paper provides a practical guide, instructing readers on how to utilize LLMs for efficient and accurate text analysis in their own research projects.