Abstract:The Turing pattern model is one type of reaction-diffusion (RD) model. The first identification of pattern formation by the Turing pattern model in an actual animal was made in the 1990s with the observation of patterns in the sea anemone. But can we assume that all epidermal patterns in animals can be explained by the Turing pattern model? Even for fish, there are some fish that are clearly not Turing patterns, differing significantly from the patterns that can be generated by RD models. For example, the body pattern of the ornamental carp Nishiki goi produced in Japan varies randomly from individual to individual, and it is difficult to predict the pattern of the offspring from that of the parent fish. A model in which these fish patterns are formed randomly is the majority voting model. From this, it can be inferred that the epidermal pattern of fish can be explained by either the Turing pattern model or the majority voting model. But how do fish use these two different models? It is hard to imagine that completely different epidermal formation mechanisms are used among species of the same family. For this reason, there may be a more basic model that can produce patterns for either model. In this study, the Turing pattern model and the majority voting model were represented by cellular automata, and then a new model integrating these two models was proposed. By adjusting the parameters, this integrated model was able to create patterns that are equivalent to both the Turing pattern model and the majority voting model. By setting the intermediate parameters values of these two models, it was possible to create a variety of patterns that were more diverse than those created by each single model. Although this model is simpler than previously proposed models, it was able to confirm that it can create a variety of patterns.

Emergence of diverse epidermal patterns via the integration of the Turing pattern model with the majority voting model

A model of octopus epidermis pattern mimicry mechanisms using inverse operation of the Turing reaction model

An adhesion code ensures robust pattern formation during tissue morphogenesis

Reaction-Diffusion Model as a Framework for Understanding Biological Pattern Formation

Mimicry mechanism model of octopus epidermis pattern by inverse operation of Turing reaction model

Extending the mathematical palette for developmental pattern formation: Piebaldism

Beyond activator-inhibitor networks: the generalised Turing mechanism

Diffusiophoresis-Enhanced Turing Patterns

Topological data analysis of zebrafish patterns

The Mechanism of Pattern Transitions between Formation and Dispersion

Feedbacks, Receptor Clustering, and Receptor Restriction to Single Cells yield large Turing Spaces for Ligand-receptor based Turing Models

The Mean-Field Survival Model for Stripe Formation in Zebrafish Exhibits Turing Instability

Modeling pattern formation in communities by using information particles

Pattern dynamics and Turing instability induced by self-super-cross-diffusive predator-prey model via amplitude equations

Taxis-driven complex patterns of a plankton model

Wavelength of a Turing-type mechanism regulates the morphogenesis of meshwork patterns

Switch and template pattern formation in a discrete reaction diffusion system inspired by the Drosophila eye

Novel Aspects in Pattern Formation Arise from Coupling Turing Reaction–Diffusion and Chemotaxis

Modeling Stripe Formation on Growing Zebrafish Tailfins

Turing Pattern Formation in Reaction-Cross-Diffusion Systems with a Bilayer Geometry

Digit patterning during limb development as a result of the BMP-receptor interaction